Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914453›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2018

Setting a Nigeria national malaria operational research agenda: the process.

Olufemi Ajumobi, Perpetua Uhomoibhi, Pamela Onyiah, Obafemi Babalola, Salami Sharafadeen, Maduka D Ughasoro, Al-Mukhtar Y Adamu, Oluwaseun Odeyinka, Taiwo Orimogunje, Ibrahim Maikore and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Health Interventions for Preventing Climate-Sensitive Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Olufemi AjumobiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria. femiajumobi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-1205
Perpetua UhomoibhiNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Pamela OnyiahNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Obafemi BabalolaNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Salami SharafadeenNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Maduka D UghasoroDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Al-Mukhtar Y AdamuDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
Oluwaseun OdeyinkaDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Taiwo OrimogunjeNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ibrahim MaikoreNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emmanuel ShekarauNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Akintayo OgunwaleDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Rotimi AfolabiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Sylvester UdehNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Akpuh NdubuisiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ntiense UmoetteNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
Patrick NgukuNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.
IkeOluwapo O AjayiNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) (GH15-1619) U2GGH001876CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmploying malaria operational research (MOR) findings in planning national malaria control programmes is gaining increased attention. The malaria control foci are diverse, resources are limited; therefore, agreeing on priority areas is critical. Hitherto, the process of prioritising MOR questions in Nigeria has been limited to few stakeholders. In support of the National Malaria Elimination Programme's (NMEP) effort at setting a MOR agenda, the Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme (NFELTP) in collaboration with NMEP conducted preliminary exploratory study to identify key malaria research gaps and needs, and provide data to inform setting a robust national MOR agenda. The process of generating data is presented in this paper.

methodsA twelve-member task-team comprising NFELTP, university researchers and NMEP officers was commissioned. Following an inaugural meeting the task-team developed a framework of activities and held five planning meetings, conducted five-week online and self-administered paper-based surveys, key informant interview (KII), two-day desk review workshop, seven-day qualitative data analysis, ten-day result and five-day report writing workshops. Paired group members conducted the interviews across six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. Abridged study report was used for a two-day MOR setting agenda stakeholders' workshop.

resultsA structured framework, study protocol and data collection instruments were developed and submitted for ethical approval. The instruments included survey questionnaire for detailed information on researchers and other stakeholders' experience with MOR, the gaps and needs in thematic MOR areas; KII and Delphi guides. After an initial scoping review, primary data were collected from purposively selected survey participants using mixed methods: - online survey (n = 100), self-administered paper-based survey (n = 85), KII (n = 40), desk review workshop (n = 22) and Delphi interviews (n = 8). Comprehensive lists of research gaps/bottlenecks and needs were generated for each thematic area in malaria control. These were used at a two-day national MOR setting stakeholder workshop (n = 54) to guide the development of national MOR agenda document.

conclusionsA systematic approach involving broad stakeholder engagement provided data and evidence-based information for development of a robust national MOR agenda. The processes involved are recommended for use in malaria endemic settings.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansMalariaNigeriaOperations ResearchProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationAgenda setting processesMalariaNigeriaOperational researchSystematic approach

Identifiers

PMID29914453
PMCPMC6004659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.