Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914431›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Borderline personality symptoms and work performance: a population-based survey.

Trees T Juurlink, Margreet Ten Have, Femke Lamers, Hein J F van Marle, Johannes R Anema, Ron de Graaf, Aartjan T F Beekman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exploring the working conditions of disabled employees: a scoping review.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Trees T JuurlinkDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, 1081, HJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.juurlink@ggzingeest.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1801-4067
Margreet Ten HaveNetherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Femke LamersDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, 1081, HJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein J F van MarleDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, 1081, HJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes R AnemaDepartment of Social Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron de GraafNetherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aartjan T F BeekmanDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Oldenaller 1, 1081, HJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLTrimbos Institute · NLGGZ inGeest · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to elucidate the interplay between borderline personality symptoms and working conditions as a pathway for impaired work performance among workers in the general population.

methodsCross-sectional data from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2) were used, including 3672 workers. Borderline personality symptoms were measured with the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) questionnaire. Working conditions (decision latitude, psychological job demands, job security and co-worker support) were assessed with the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ). Impaired work performance was assessed as total work loss days per month, defined as the sum of days of three types of impaired work performance (inability to work, cut-down to work, and diminished quality at work). These were assessed with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS). Common mental disorders (CMD) were assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

resultsNumber of borderline personality symptoms was consistently associated with impaired work performance, even after controlling for type or number of adverse working conditions and co-occurrence of CMD. Borderline personality symptoms were associated with low decision latitude, job insecurity and low co-worker support. The relationship between borderline personality symptoms and work performance diminished slightly after controlling for type or number of working conditions.

conclusionsThe current study shows that having borderline personality symptoms is a unique determinant of work performance. This association seems partially explained through the impact of borderline personality symptoms on working conditions. Future studies are warranted to study causality and should aim at diminishing borderline personality symptoms and coping with working conditions.

Indexed as

Work PerformanceAdolescentAdultBorderline Personality DisorderCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPersonalitySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBorderline personality symptomsEmploymentOccupational healthPublic healthWork performance

Identifiers

PMID29914431
PMCPMC6006846
OpenAlexW2808440574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.