Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914428›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

A retrospective study of gestational weight gain in relation to the Institute of Medicine's recommendations by maternal body mass index in rural Pennsylvania from 2006 to 2015.

Michael L Power, Melisa L Lott, A Dhanya Mackeen, Jessica DiBari, Jay Schulkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adult obesity treatment and prevention: A trans-agency commentary on the research landscape, gaps, and future opportunities.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Determinants of excessive gestational weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael L PowerResearch Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, PO Box 96920, Washington, DC, 20090-6920, USA. mpower@acog.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6120-3528
Melisa L LottGeisinger, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Danville, PA, USA.
A Dhanya MackeenGeisinger, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Danville, PA, USA.
Jessica DiBariHealth Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Office of Epidemiology and Research, Division of Research, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jay SchulkinResearch Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, PO Box 96920, Washington, DC, 20090-6920, USA.
Geisinger Medical Center · USHealth Resources and Services Administration · USSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Maternal and Child Health Bureau UA6MC19010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published guidance on gestational weight gain (GWG) modified by maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). Estimates indicate that less than half of US pregnant women have GWG within recommendations. This study examined GWG from before (2006-2009) and after (2010-2015) the release of the IOM guidance in a rural, non-Hispanic white population to assess the proportion of women with GWG outside of IOM guidance, whether GWG became more likely to be within IOM guidance after 2010, and identify potential maternal factors associated with GWG outside of recommendations.

methodsWe examined GWG in 18,217 term singleton births between 2006 and 2015 in which maternal pre-pregnancy BMI could be calculated from electronic medical records at Geisinger, PA, and a subset of 12,912 births in which weekly GWG in the third trimester could be calculated. The primary outcome was whether GWG was below, within, or above recommendations based on maternal BMI. The relationships between GWG, maternal BMI, parity, age at conception, gestation length, and maternal blood pressure were examined.

resultsGWG declined with increasing maternal BMI, however, more than 50% of overweight and obese women gained above IOM recommendations. About one of five women gained below recommendations (21.3%) with underweight women the most likely to gain below recommendations (33.0%). The proportion of births with usable data increased after 2010, driven by a higher probability of recording maternal weight. However, the proportion of women who gained below, within or above recommendations did not change over the ten years. GWG above recommendations was associated with higher maternal BMI, lower parity, and longer gestation. GWG below recommendations was associated with lower maternal BMI, higher parity, shorter gestation, and younger age at conception. Maternal blood pressure was higher for GWG outside recommendations.

conclusionsDespite the publication of IOM recommendations in 2009 and an apparent increase in tracking maternal weight after 2010, GWG in this population did not change between 2006 and 2015. A majority of overweight and obese women gained above recommendations. GWG below recommendations continues to occur, and is prevalent among underweight women.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGestational Weight GainAdultFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMothersNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionObesityPennsylvaniaPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBody mass indexGestational weight gainGuidelinesObesityObstetricsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29914428
PMCPMC6006928
OpenAlexW2808020257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.