ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Evaluating methods of inferring gene regulatory networks highlights their lack of performance for single cell gene expression data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for bioinformatics of single-cell sequencing data analysis in Alzheimer's disease: review, recommendation, implementation and application.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.BioData mining · 2026Review
- Tensor network-based gene regulatory network inference for single-cell transcriptomic data.iScience · 2026Article
- Large-scale, interpretable gene regulatory network inference through biologically informed matrix factorization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CroCoNet: a framework for the quantitative comparison of gene regulatory networks across species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Data-intensive immune network modelling for One Health.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks for gene regulatory network inference.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Computational blueprints for cell fate programming.Stem cell reports · 2026Review
- Gene regulatory networks: from correlative models to causal explanations.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- CeSpGRN: inferring cell-specific gene regulatory networks from single-cell multi-omics and spatial data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Multiscale predictive cellular modeling: integrating hypothesis grammars, digital twins, and multi-omics for In silico oncology and precision theranostics.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- A unified framework for selecting and evaluating cell-type-specific gene co-expressions in single-cell data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- GeneSNAKE: a Python package for simulation of gene regulatory networks and perturbation-induced expression data.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- scGraphVerse: a modular workflow for single-cell gene network inference.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Null models for comparing information decomposition across complex systems.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Cell type heterogeneity in gene co-expression networks: implications for toxicological research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Loss of CD98HC phosphorylation by ATM impairs antiporter trafficking and drives glutamate toxicity in Ataxia telangiectasia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Model-to-crop conserved NUE Regulons enhance machine learning predictions of nitrogen use efficiency.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Landscape of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Human PDAC.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Identifying reproducible transcription regulator coexpression patterns with single cell transcriptomics.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA fundamental fact in biology states that genes do not operate in isolation, and yet, methods that infer regulatory networks for single cell gene expression data have been slow to emerge. With single cell sequencing methods now becoming accessible, general network inference algorithms that were initially developed for data collected from bulk samples may not be suitable for single cells. Meanwhile, although methods that are specific for single cell data are now emerging, whether they have improved performance over general methods is unknown. In this study, we evaluate the applicability of five general methods and three single cell methods for inferring gene regulatory networks from both experimental single cell gene expression data and in silico simulated data.
resultsStandard evaluation metrics using ROC curves and Precision-Recall curves against reference sets sourced from the literature demonstrated that most of the methods performed poorly when they were applied to either experimental single cell data, or simulated single cell data, which demonstrates their lack of performance for this task. Using default settings, network methods were applied to the same datasets. Comparisons of the learned networks highlighted the uniqueness of some predicted edges for each method. The fact that different methods infer networks that vary substantially reflects the underlying mathematical rationale and assumptions that distinguish network methods from each other.
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive evaluation of network modeling algorithms applied to experimental single cell gene expression data and in silico simulated datasets where the network structure is known. Comparisons demonstrate that most of these assessed network methods are not able to predict network structures from single cell expression data accurately, even if they are specifically developed for single cell methods. Also, single cell methods, which usually depend on more elaborative algorithms, in general have less similarity to each other in the sets of edges detected. The results from this study emphasize the importance for developing more accurate optimized network modeling methods that are compatible for single cell data. Newly-developed single cell methods may uniquely capture particular features of potential gene-gene relationships, and caution should be taken when we interpret these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.