Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29914232›Full record

ArticleBalkan medical journal2018

Current Practice in Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia in Public Hospitals of Greece: A 2016 National Survey

Chryssoula Staikou, Alexandros Μakris, Kassiani Theodoraki, Athanasia Τsaroucha, Amalia Douma, Eleni Μoka, Eleni Αrnaoutoglou, Tilemahos Paraskevopoulos, Ioanna Siafaka, Efi Stavropoulou and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Balkan medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chryssoula StaikouClinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GreeceORCID 0000-0001-7336-0443
Alexandros ΜakrisClinic of Anesthesia, Asklipieio Voulas General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Kassiani TheodorakiClinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, GreeceORCID 0000-0003-4890-4642
Athanasia ΤsarouchaClinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
Amalia DoumaClinic of Anesthesia, Georgios Gennimatas General Hospital, Athens, GreeceORCID 0000-0002-6169-2181
Eleni ΜokaClinic of Anesthesia, Creta Interclinic Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Eleni ΑrnaoutoglouClinic of Anesthesia, General University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
Tilemahos ParaskevopoulosClinic of Anesthesia, General Hospital of Attica KAT, Athens, Greece
Ioanna SiafakaClinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
Efi StavropoulouClinic of Anesthesia, General Hospital of Attica KAT, Athens, Greece
Eriphili ΑrgyraClinic of Anesthesia, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRGeneral Hospital of Attica · GRGeneral Hospital Asklepieio Voulas · GRGeneral Hospital of Athens G. Genimatas · GRPolyclinic General Hospital · GRUniversity Hospital of Larissa · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This descriptive survey was to evaluate the use of regional anesthesia in obstetrics in Greek public hospitals. Methods: The survey was conducted between March and August 2016. A structured questionnaire was sent to 50 anesthesia departments in Greek public hospitals with obstetric units. Results: The response rate was 94%. Data corresponding to 9475 cesarean and 8155 vaginal deliveries were collected. Regional anesthesia was used in 69.2% of all cesareans, with single shot spinal being the most popular (44.3% of all cesareans). Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was used in 18.1% of all cesareans (35.1% in hospitals of Athens versus 7.9% outside Athens, p<0.001). Post-cesarean analgesia was applied with simple analgesics and systematic opioids (78.6%). Long-acting spinal opioids were rarely used (4.4% of spinal and spinal/epidurals). Labor epidural analgesia was applied in 19.1% of all vaginal deliveries (30.3% in Athens versus 13.1% outside Athens, p<0.001). Paracetamol and pethidine represented the standard labor analgesics in 48.9% and 55.3% of all hospitals. Intravenous remifentanil was used in 10.6% of hospitals (50% in Athens versus 2.5% outside Athens, p=0.002). In 48.9% of hospitals, mainly outside Athens, the anesthesiologists did not get involved in labor analgesia. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia is the most common practice for cesareans in Greek public hospitals; however, the percentage of general anesthesia remains high. In addition, the use of labor epidural analgesia is limited in hospitals outside Athens.

Indexed as

Analgesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, ObstetricalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGreeceHealth Care SurveysHospitals, PublicHumansLabor PainPain ManagementPregnancyAnalgesiahealthcareobstetricalregional anesthesiasurvey

Identifiers

PMID29914232
PMCPMC6158474
OpenAlexW2809418691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.