Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29913284›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Effect sizes of BOLD CVR, resting-state signal fluctuations and time delay measures for the assessment of hemodynamic impairment in carotid occlusion patients.

Jill B De Vis, Alex A Bhogal, Jeroen Hendrikse, Esben T Petersen, Jeroen C W Siero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Noninvasive modulation of human corticostriatal activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Separating vascular and neuronal effects of age on fMRI BOLD signals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jill B De VisNational Institute of Health (NIH) / National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: jill.devis@nih.gov.
Alex A BhogalDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.bhogal@umcutrecht.nl.
Jeroen HendrikseDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.hendrikse@umcutrecht.nl.
Esben T PetersenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark. Electronic address: esbentp@drcmr.dk.
Jeroen C W SieroDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.c.w.siero@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

European Research Council 637024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe BOLD signal amplitude as a response to a hypercapnia stimulus is commonly used to assess cerebrovascular reserve. Despite recent advances, the implementation remains cumbersome and alternative ways to assess hemodynamic impairment are desirable. Resting-state BOLD signal fluctuations (rsBOLD) have been proposed however data on its sensitivity and dependence on baseline venous cerebral blood volume (vCBV) is limited. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effect sizes of resting-state and hypercapnia induced BOLD signal changes in the detection of hemodynamic impairment. The second aim of the study was to assess the dependence of BOLD signal variability on vCBV. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifteen patients with internal carotid artery occlusive disease and 15 matched healthy controls were included in this study. The BOLD signal was derived from a dual-echo gradient-echo echo-planar sequence during hypercapnia (HC) and hyperoxia (HO) gas modulations. BOLD (fractional) amplitude of low frequency fluctuations ((f)ALFF) was compared to HC-BOLD, BOLD response delays derived from time delay analysis and ΔBOLD in response to progressively increasing HC. Effect sizes (i.e. the standard mean difference between patients and controls) were calculated. HO-BOLD was used to estimate vCBV, and its contribution to the variability in rsBOLD signal was evaluated.

resultsThe effect sizes of ALFF and fALFF (0.61 and 0.72) were lower than the effect sizes related to hypercapnia-based hemodynamic assessment analysis; 1.62, 1.56 and 0.90 for HC-BOLD, BOLD response delays and ΔBOLD in response to progressively increasing HC. A moderate relation was found between (f)ALFF and HC-BOLD in controls (R

conclusionALFF and fALFF demonstrated a moderate effect size to detect hemodynamic impairment whereas the effect size was large for methods employing a hypercapnia-based vascular stress stimulus. Based on our analysis of BOLD signal change as a response to a progressively increasing hypercapnia stimulus we can argue that a hypercapnia stimulus of at least 2 mmHg above baseline EtCO

Indexed as

AgedBlood VolumeBrainBrain MappingCarotid Artery DiseasesCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHemodynamicsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedBlood oxygen level dependentBOLDBrainCerebrovascular diseaseCerebrovascular reactivityfMRIMagnetic resonance imagingMRIResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID29913284
PMCPMC6057274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.