Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29913253›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

C11 Methionine PET (MET-PET) Imaging of Glioblastoma for Detecting Postoperative Residual Disease and Response to Chemoradiation Therapy.

Yingbing Wang, Otto Rapalino, Pedram Heidari, Jay Loeffler, Helen A Shih, Kevin Oh, Umar Mahmood

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of Metabolic Reprogramming to Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingbing WangDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ywang34@partners.org.
Otto RapalinoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pedram HeidariDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jay LoefflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Helen A ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kevin OhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Umar MahmoodDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

PROTON THERAPY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT CENTERC06CA059267 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GOITEIN, MICHAEL · 1992 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS C06 CA059267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResponse criteria of glioblastoma after chemoradiation do not account for metabolic changes that occur after treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with C11 methionine (MET) (MET-PET) for detecting changes that occur after chemoradiation therapy and the value of molecular biomarkers for predicting the magnitude of metabolic response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing standard chemoradiation treatment were enrolled in this prospective imaging study, with MET-PET scan performed within 3 days after surgical resection and again at 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. Near contemporaneous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 weeks of each MET-PET scan. MET-PET imaging was analyzed for maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), SUVmean, and SUVvolume on a multimodality workstation.

resultsA total of 18 patients underwent baseline postoperative MET-PET imaging, 14 of whom underwent postchemoradiation MET-PET imaging. Among those who showed residual MET-avid disease on immediate postoperative MET-PET scans and underwent postchemoradiation MET-PET imaging (n = 10), mean ΔSUVmax was -40% (range -100% to 0%), mean ΔSUVmean was -35% (range -100% to 0%), and mean ΔSUV volume was -64% (range -100% to 0%). The Δtumor/brain reference was -40% (range -100% to 0%) using SUVmax and -35% (range -100% to 0%) using SUVmean. In contrast, none of the T2-weighted images on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed a >25% reduction in abnormal T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal on visual assessment. ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVmean, and ΔSUVvolume correlated with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status (P = .01), but not with epidermal growth factor receptor or c-MET amplification status. All patients were IDH-1 wildtype.

conclusionsMET-PET scanning shows a significant decrease in metabolic signal at 1 month after chemoradiation compared with the immediate postoperative period, even when T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery changed little. MGMT promoter methylation status further predicts differential metabolic responses. MET-PET may be a useful tool for delineation of radiation targets and assessment of response.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyMethioninePositron-Emission TomographyAgedFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPostoperative PeriodTreatment Outcomecarbon-11 methionineMethionine

Identifiers

PMID29913253
PMCPMC7336810
OpenAlexW2809243263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.