Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29913020›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2018

Effect of Tamsulosin on Passage of Symptomatic Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Andrew C Meltzer, Pamela Katzen Burrows, Allan B Wolfson, Judd E Hollander, Michael Kurz, Ziya Kirkali, John W Kusek, Patrick Mufarrij, Stephen V Jackman, Jeremy Brown

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00382265 (Study of Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00382265 phase4completednot on this map

Study of Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorAndrew MeltzerRan2008 to 2017Enrolled512ConditionsUreterolithiasesArmstamsulosin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Choice of medical treatment for renal colic: A survey of Chinese urologists].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C MeltzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Pamela Katzen BurrowsThe George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC.
Allan B WolfsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Judd E HollanderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael KurzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham.
Ziya KirkaliNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
John W KusekNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patrick MufarrijDepartment of Urology, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Stephen V JackmanDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jeremy BrownNational Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
George Washington University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USNational Institute of General Medical Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Multi-Center Study of Tamsulosin for Ureteral Stones in the Emergency DepartmentU01DK096037 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACPHERSON, CORA ANN BUCKLEY, MELTZER, ANDREW C · 2012 to 2016
$4.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK096037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results: The mean age of 512 participants randomized to tamsulosin or placebo was 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTamsulosinTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AntagonistsTamsulosin

Identifiers

PMID29913020
PMCPMC6082698
OpenAlexW2808187621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.