Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2018
Effect of Tamsulosin on Passage of Symptomatic Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00382265 (Study of Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Tamsulosin for Urolithiasis in the Emergency Department
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of mirabegron for ureteral stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of 22 drug interventions as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of adjunctive alpha-blocker therapy before ureteroscopy in the management of ureteral stones.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Is tamsulosin effective for the passage of symptomatic ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Desmodium styracifolium Total Flavone Capsules for Urolithiasis: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Validation of an Automated CT Image Analysis in the Prevention of Urinary Stones with Hydration Trial.Journal of endourology · 2025Trial
- Adjudication of Self-reported Symptomatic Stone Recurrence in the Prevention of Urinary Stones With Hydration Trial.Urology · 2024Trial
- Accuracy of Patient Reported Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic Treated in the Emergency Department.Urology · 2020Trial
- Proximal/Distal ureteral diameter ratio as a predictor of spontaneous passage in <10 mm ureteral stones.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Tamsulosin versus placebo for medical expulsive therapy in ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Review
- Off-label prescribing of tamsulosin: A nationwide retrospective study combining prescription and regulatory data.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Real-world safety assessment of tamsulosin based on adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the management of urinary stones, third edition.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Article
- Visualizing the landscape of urolithiasis research from 1979-2023: a global bibliometric analysis of randomized clinical trials.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with TFDS in the treatment of urolithiasis.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- [Choice of medical treatment for renal colic: A survey of Chinese urologists].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
- A prospective evaluation of patient-reported outcomes during follow-up of ureteral stones managed with medical expulsive treatment (MET).Urolithiasis · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results: The mean age of 512 participants randomized to tamsulosin or placebo was 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.