Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912987›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Performance of point-of-care birth HIV testing in primary health care clinics: An observational cohort study.

Bindiya Meggi, Lara Vojnov, Nedio Mabunda, Adolfo Vubil, Alcina Zitha, Ocean Tobaiwa, Chishamiso Mudenyanga, Dadirayi Mutsaka, Timothy Bollinger, Osvaldo Loquiha and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Impact of Point-of-Care Birth Test-and-Treat on Clinical Outcomes Among Infants With HIV: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Mozambique and Tanzania.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  5. A Randomized Trial of Point-of-Care Early Infant Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Diagnosis in Zambia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bindiya MeggiInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-4321-8478
Lara VojnovClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nedio MabundaInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Adolfo VubilInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Alcina ZithaInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ocean TobaiwaClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Chishamiso MudenyangaClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Dadirayi MutsakaClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-0100-8384
Timothy BollingerClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Osvaldo LoquihaDepartment of Mathematics and Informatics, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Trevor F PeterClinton Health Access Initiative, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ilesh V JaniInstituto Nacional da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Clinton Health Access Initiative · USInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZEduardo Mondlane University · MZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailure to timely diagnose HIV in infants is a major barrier for scaling-up paediatric antiretroviral treatment (ART). WHO recommends birth testing for earlier diagnosis and to improve test coverage, but current diagnosis takes 2-3 weeks to complete, thereby limiting the ability of care givers to provide follow-on care, especially in low-resource settings. We evaluated the benefit of implementing rapid diagnosis of HIV at birth in primary health care maternity wards in Mozambique. METHODS AND

findingsInfants born to HIV-infected mothers delivering consecutively at eight primary health care clinics were tested within 24 hours of delivery using on-site POC (Alere q HIV1/2 Detect) and standard laboratory (Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan HIV-1 qualitative assay v2.0) testing. Infants were also tested at 4-6 weeks of age with both assays. Of 2,350 HIV-exposed infants enrolled in this implementation research study, 33 tested HIV-positive at birth on both assays. Sensitivity and specificity of POC testing compared with laboratory testing at birth were 100% (95% CI 89·4-100·0) and 100% (95% CI 99·8-100·0), respectively. At 4-6 weeks of age, 61 infants were identified as HIV-positive; of these 29 (47·5%) had a positive test at birth. Testing at both birth and 4-6 weeks identified 71 HIV-positive infants compared with 61 infants by testing at 4-6 weeks alone, a 16% increase. Two infants tested positive at birth but tested HIV-negative during follow-up.

conclusionsAdding POC birth testing to the 4-6 week screen may increase access to HIV diagnosis and expedite ART initiation in primary health care settings within low resource settings. Guidance on appropriate confirmatory HIV testing algorithms for birth testing is needed.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCohort StudiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMozambiquePoint-of-Care TestingPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-HIV AgentsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29912987
PMCPMC6005575
OpenAlexW2809321571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.