Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912950›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A CRISPR screen identifies MAPK7 as a target for combination with MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant NSCLC.

Nicholas Dompe, Christiaan Klijn, Sara A Watson, Katherine Leng, Jenna Port, Trinna Cuellar, Colin Watanabe, Benjamin Haley, Richard Neve, Marie Evangelista and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. CRISPRingCancers · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. CRISPR and KRAS: a match yet to be made.Journal of biomedical science · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The MEK5/ERK5 Pathway in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas DompeDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Christiaan KlijnDepartment of Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Sara A WatsonDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-9357
Katherine LengDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Jenna PortDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Trinna CuellarDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Colin WatanabeDepartment of Bioinformatics, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Benjamin HaleyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Richard NeveDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Marie EvangelistaDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4623-1595
David StokoeDepartment of Discovery Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-5364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutant KRAS represents one of the most frequently observed oncogenes in NSCLC, yet no therapies are approved for tumors that express activated KRAS variants. While there is strong rationale for the use of MEK inhibitors to treat tumors with activated RAS/MAPK signaling, these have proven ineffective clinically. We therefore implemented a CRISPR screening approach to identify novel agents to sensitize KRAS mutant NSCLC cells to MEK inhibitor treatment. This approach identified multiple components of the canonical RAS/MAPK pathway consistent with previous studies. In addition, we identified MAPK7 as a novel, strong hit and validated this finding using multiple orthogonal approaches including knockdown and pharmacological inhibition. We show that MAPK7 inhibition attenuates the re-activation of MAPK signaling occurring following long-term MEK inhibition, thereby illustrating that MAPK7 mediates pathway reactivation in the face of MEK inhibition. Finally, genetic knockdown of MAPK7 combined with the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib in a mutant KRAS NSCLC xenograft model to mediate improved tumor growth inhibition. These data highlight that MAPK7 represents a promising target for combination treatment with MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant NSCLC.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 7Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanMAPK7 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 7Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID29912950
PMCPMC6005515
OpenAlexW2809005882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.