ArticlePloS one2018
Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF in patients with presumptive tuberculous meningitis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Prediction Model for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of tuberculosis among prisoners in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous meningitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2021Pooled it
- Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled analysis of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Recent advances in nanomaterials for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Combined modalities for the rapid diagnosis of patients with suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis: A cross-sectional study.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2024Article
- Review
- Clinical and Radiological End Points to Stop Anti-Tubercular Treatment in Central Nervous System Tuberculoma and Predictors of Poor Outcome: A Retrospective Study.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Diagnostic challenges in tuberculous meningitis: a case report with negative genexpert result.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Article
- Improving Technology to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis: Are We There Yet?Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Normal cerebrospinal fluid protein and associated clinical characteristics in children with tuberculous meningitis.Annals of medicine · 2021Article
- Highly specific and sensitive detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined with a nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- Adoption of evidence-informed guidelines in prescribing protease inhibitors for HIV-Tuberculosis co-infected patients on rifampicin and effects on HIV treatment outcomes in Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Clinical features of adult patients with a definite diagnosis of central nervous system tuberculosis in an endemic country: A 13-year retrospective review.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020Article
- Article
- Low diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis: A multicenter surveillance.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeningitis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We evaluated the performance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing with the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus traditional approaches for diagnosing tuberculosis meningitis (TBM).
methodsPatients were adults (n = 37) presenting with suspected TBM to the Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima, Peru, during 12 months until 1st January 2015. Each participant had a single CSF specimen that was divided into aliquots that were concurrently tested for M. tuberculosis using GeneXpert, Ziehl-Neelsen smear and culture on solid and liquid media. Drug susceptibility testing used Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT 960) and the proportions method.
results81% (30/37) of patients received a final clinical diagnosis of TBM, of whom 63% (19/30, 95% confidence intervals, CI: 44-80%) were HIV-positive. 22% (8/37, 95%CI: 9.8-38%), of patients had definite TBM. Because definite TBM was defined by positivity in any laboratory test, all laboratory tests had 100% specificity. Considering the 30 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of TBM: diagnostic sensitivity was 23% (7/30, 95%CI: 9.9-42%) for GeneXpert and was the same for all culture results combined; considerably greater than 7% (2/30, 95%CI: 0.82-22%) for microscopy; whereas all laboratory tests had poor negative predictive values (20-23%). Considering only the 8 patients with definite TBM: diagnostic sensitivity was 88% (7/8, 95%CI: 47-100%) for GeneXpert; 75% (6/8, 95%CI: 35-97%) for MGIT culture or LJ culture; 50% (4/8, 95%CI 16-84) for Ogawa culture and 25% (2/8, 95%CI: 3.2-65%) for microscopy. GeneXpert and microscopy provided same-day results, whereas culture took 20-56 days. GeneXpert provided same-day rifampicin-susceptibility results, whereas culture-based testing took 32-71 days. 38% (3/8, 95%CI: 8.5-76%) of patients with definite TBM with data had evidence of drug-resistant TB, but 73% (22/30) of all clinically diagnosed TBM (definite, probable, and possible TBM) had no drug-susceptibility results available.
conclusionsCompared with traditional culture-based methods of CSF testing, GeneXpert had similar yield and faster results for both the detection of M. tuberculosis and drug-susceptibility testing. Including use of the GeneXpert has the capacity to improve the diagnosis of TBM cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.