ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018
Scientometrics analysis of research activity and collaboration patterns in Chagas cardiomyopathy.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- More than malaria: ExploringCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026Review
- Research on neglected tropical diseases in Haiti: a scientometrics analysis, 1923-2022.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Knowledge Production on Congenital Chagas Disease across Time, Borders and Disciplines: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Global research on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Scientometric review of research on Neglected Tropical Diseases: a 31-year perspective from the Journal of the Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2023Article
- Research in Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak (Rhinorrhea and Otorrhea): A Bibliometric Analysis From 1945 to 2018.Cureus · 2022Article
- Scientometric analysis of research on trachoma in Brazil, 2000-2020.Revista de saude publica · 2022Article
- Global trends in research related to sleeve gastrectomy: A bibliometric and visualized study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Research Trends and Collaboration Patterns on Polymyxin Resistance: A Bibliometric Analysis (2010-2019).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- 30 years of parasitology research analysed by text mining.Parasitology · 2020Article
- Article
- HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships.Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Bibliometric assessment and key messages of sporotrichosis research (1945-2018).F1000Research · 2020Article
- A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001-2015): a global bibliometric analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChagas cardiomyopathy is a serious and common complication of Chagas disease.
methodsThrough bibliometric and Social Network Analysis, we examined patterns of research on Chagas cardiomyopathy, identifying the main countries, authors, research clusters, and topics addressed; and measuring the contribution of different countries.
resultsWe found 1932 documents on Chagas cardiomyopathy in the MEDLINE database. The most common document type was 'journal article', accounting for 79.6% of the total (n = 1538), followed by 'review' (n = 217, 11.2%). The number of published records increased from 156 in 1980-1984 to 311 in 2010-2014. Only 2.5% were clinical trials. Brazil and the USA dominated the research, participating in 53.1% and 25.7%, respectively, of the documents. Other Latin American countries where Chagas is endemic contributed less, with Bolivia, where Chagas disease is most prevalent, producing only 1.8% of the papers. We observed a high rate of domestic collaboration (83.1% of the documents published in 2010-2016) and a lower but significant rate of international collaboration (32.5% in the same time period). Although clinical research dominated overall, the USA, Mexico and several countries in Europe produced a considerable body of basic research on animal models. We identified four main research clusters, focused on heart failure and dysfunction (physical symptoms, imaging techniques, treatment), and on myocarditis and parasitemia in animal models.
conclusionsResearch on Chagas cardiomyopathy increased over the study period. There were more clinical than basic studies, though very few of the documents were clinical trials. Brazil and the USA are currently leading the research on this subject, while some highly endemic countries, such as Bolivia, have contributed very little. Different approaches could help to redress this imbalance: encouraging researchers to conduct more clinical trials, launching international collaborations to help endemic countries contribute more, and strengthening links between basic and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.