Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912443›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2018

Genomic comparison of two independent seagrass lineages reveals habitat-driven convergent evolution.

HueyTyng Lee, Agnieszka A Golicz, Philipp E Bayer, Anita A Severn-Ellis, Chon-Kit Kenneth Chan, Jacqueline Batley, Gary A Kendrick, David Edwards

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The evolutionary past and the uncertain future of foundational species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 2b-RAD Genotyping of the SeagrassFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  14. Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

HueyTyng LeeSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Agnieszka A GoliczPlant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
Anita A Severn-EllisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
Chon-Kit Kenneth ChanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
Gary A KendrickSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.
The University of Western Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seagrasses are marine angiosperms that live fully submerged in the sea. They evolved from land plant ancestors, with multiple species representing at least three independent return-to-the-sea events. This raises the question of whether these marine angiosperms followed the same adaptation pathway to allow them to live and reproduce under the hostile marine conditions. To compare the basis of marine adaptation between seagrass lineages, we generated genomic data for Halophila ovalis and compared this with recently published genomes for two members of Zosteraceae, as well as genomes of five non-marine plant species (Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa, Phoenix dactylifera, Musa acuminata, and Spirodela polyrhiza). Halophila and Zosteraceae represent two independent seagrass lineages separated by around 30 million years. Genes that were lost or conserved in both lineages were identified. All three species lost genes associated with ethylene and terpenoid biosynthesis, and retained genes related to salinity adaptation, such as those for osmoregulation. In contrast, the loss of the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex is unique to H. ovalis. Through comparison of two independent return-to-the-sea events, this study further describes marine adaptation characteristics common to seagrass families, identifies species-specific gene loss, and provides molecular evidence for convergent evolution in seagrass lineages.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsAdaptation, PhysiologicalEcosystemHydrocharitaceaeMagnoliopsidaSpecies SpecificityZosteraceae

Identifiers

PMID29912443
PMCPMC6022596
OpenAlexW2800835812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.