Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912401›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2018

Challenges to Reshape the Future of Type 1 Diabetes Research.

David Bleich, David H Wagner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David BleichDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey.
David H WagnerImmunology Section, Department of Medicine and The Webb-Waring Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Development of a Clinical Screening Platform for Type 1 DiabetesR42DK115296 · NIDDK · OP-T-MUNE, INC. · PI WAGNER, DAVID H. · 2017 to 2019
$1.6M
Developing a small peptide to control autoimmune inflammation in type 1 diabetesR41AI131784 · NIAID · OP-T-MUNE, INC. · PI WAGNER, DAVID H. · 2017 to 2017
$297k
NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI131784NIDDK NIH HHS R42 DK115296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Immunotherapy trials to prevent type 1 diabetes have been unsuccessful for >15 years. Understanding pitfalls and knowledge gaps in the immunology of type 1 diabetes should lead us in new directions that will yield better trial outcomes. A proposal is made for precision medicine trial design in future type 1 diabetes studies. Evidence Acquisition: High-quality peer-reviewed basic science and clinical research trials for type 1 diabetes were used in this Perspective article. Type 1 diabetes publications were reviewed from 2000 to 2018 by using Google Scholar and PubMed reference databases. Evidence Synthesis: Personalized medicine for type 1 diabetes should recognize that each individual has phenotypic and genotypic quirks that distinguish them from other study participants. A uniform protocol for antigen-specific immunotherapy has consistently failed to prevent disease. An alternative approach using molecular tools to personalize the preventive treatment strategy might be a road forward for type 1 diabetes research. Assumptions or lack of knowledge about disease stratification (not all type 1 diabetes is the same disease), individualized antigen-specific T cells, regulatory T-cell populations, and T-cell receptor rearrangement are just a few aspects of immunology that require integration with clinical trial design. Conclusions: The type 1 diabetes research community continues to bring forward novel immunotherapy trials to prevent disease, but this approach is unlikely to succeed until several fundamental aspects of clinical immunology are recognized and addressed. Here, we identify several knowledge gaps that could rectify type 1 diabetes trial design and lead to future success.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicHumansPrecision MedicineTherapies, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID29912401
PMCPMC6692708
OpenAlexW2807918129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.