Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912376›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2018

Arabidopsis phospholipase Dα1 and Dδ oppositely modulate EDS1- and SA-independent basal resistance against adapted powdery mildew.

Qiong Zhang, Robert Berkey, Joshua J Blakeslee, Jinshan Lin, Xianfeng Ma, Harlan King, Anna Liddle, Liang Guo, Teun Munnik, Xuemin Wang and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Shot-Gun Proteomic Analysis on Roots of ArabidopsisInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Qiong ZhangInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Robert BerkeyInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Joshua J BlakesleeDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USA.
Jinshan LinDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USA.
Xianfeng MaInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Harlan KingInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Anna LiddleInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
Liang GuoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, College of Plant Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Teun MunnikSection of Plant Physiology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xuemin WangDepartment of Biology, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Shunyuan XiaoInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USThe Ohio State University · USHuazhong Agricultural University · CNNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLUniversity of Missouri–St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants use a tightly regulated immune system to fight off various pathogens. Phospholipase D (PLD) and its product, phosphatidic acid, have been shown to influence plant immunity; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis mutants pldα1 and pldδ, respectively, exhibited enhanced resistance and enhanced susceptibility to both well-adapted and poorly adapted powdery mildew pathogens, and a virulent oomycete pathogen, indicating that PLDα1 negatively while PLDδ positively modulates post-penetration resistance. The pldα1δ double mutant showed a similar infection phenotype to pldα1, genetically placing PLDα1 downstream of PLDδ. Detailed genetic analyses of pldδ with mutations in genes for salicylic acid (SA) synthesis (SID2) and/or signaling (EDS1 and PAD4), measurement of SA and jasmonic acid (JA) levels, and expression of their respective reporter genes indicate that PLDδ contributes to basal resistance independent of EDS1/PAD4, SA, and JAsignaling. Interestingly, while PLDα1-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) was mainly found in the tonoplast before and after haustorium invasion, PLDδ-eGFP's focal accumulation to the plasma membrane around the fungal penetration site appeared to be suppressed by adapted powdery mildew. Together, our results demonstrate that PLDα1 and PLDδ oppositely modulate basal, post-penetration resistance against powdery mildew through a non-canonical mechanism that is independent of EDS1/PAD4, SA, and JA.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsAscomycotaDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhospholipase DPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunitySalicylic AcidArabidopsis ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEDS1 protein, ArabidopsisPhospholipase Dphospholipase D deltaPLDA1 protein, ArabidopsisSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID29912376
PMCPMC6022666
OpenAlexW2803018438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.