Trial reportBrain : a journal of neurology2018
Randomized trial of iReadMore word reading training and brain stimulation in central alexia.
Trial report in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Brain Mechanisms Underlying Reading Improvement in Central Alexia
Investigating the Clinical Effectiveness of iReadMore; a Digital Therapy for People With Alexia (Acquired Dyslexia)
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromodulation for post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: established cortical stimulation and emerging network-based targets.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Navigating the Complexity of Bilingual Aphasia: Current Insights and Future Directions.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Dosage Frequency Effects on Treatment Outcomes Following Self-managed Digital Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Are People With Poststroke Aphasia Receptive to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation? A Survey.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
- Use of Mobile/Tablet and Web-Based Applications to Support Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Scoping Review.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Assessment of language impairment and function.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Treatment of post-stroke aphasia: A narrative review for stroke neurologists.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021Review
- Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation and Behavioral Training, a Promising Tool for a Tailor-Made Post-stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Is Aphasia Treatment Beneficial for the Elderly? A Review of Recent Evidence.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020Article
- Efficacy of spoken word comprehension therapy in patients with chronic aphasia: a cross-over randomised controlled trial with structural imaging.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2020Article
- A Review of Biological Interventions in Chronic Aphasia.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2020Article
- The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2020Review
- Review
- How Does iReadMore Therapy Change the Reading Network of Patients with Central Alexia?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Aphasia Recovery: When, How and Who to Treat?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018Review
- Design Innovation for Engaging and Accessible Digital Aphasia Therapies: Framework Analysis of the iReadMore App Co-Design Process.JMIR neurotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Central alexia is an acquired reading disorder co-occurring with a generalized language deficit (aphasia). We tested the impact of a novel training app, 'iReadMore', and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left inferior frontal gyrus, on word reading ability in central alexia. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02062619). Twenty-one chronic stroke patients with central alexia participated. A baseline-controlled, repeated-measures, crossover design was used. Participants completed two 4-week blocks of iReadMore training, one with anodal stimulation and one with sham stimulation (order counterbalanced between participants). Each block comprised 34 h of iReadMore training and 11 stimulation sessions. Outcome measures were assessed before, between and after the two blocks. The primary outcome measures were reading ability for trained and untrained words. Secondary outcome measures included semantic word matching, sentence reading, text reading and a self-report measure. iReadMore training resulted in an 8.7% improvement in reading accuracy for trained words (95% confidence interval 6.0 to 11.4; Cohen's d = 1.38) but did not generalize to untrained words. Reaction times also improved. Reading accuracy gains were still significant (but reduced) 3 months after training cessation. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (compared to sham), delivered concurrently with iReadMore, resulted in a 2.6% (95% confidence interval -0.1 to 5.3; d = 0.41) facilitation for reading accuracy, both for trained and untrained words. iReadMore also improved performance on the semantic word-matching test. There was a non-significant trend towards improved self-reported reading ability. However, no significant changes were seen at the sentence or text reading level. In summary, iReadMore training in post-stroke central alexia improved reading ability for trained words, with good maintenance of the therapy effect. Anodal stimulation resulted in a small facilitation (d = 0.41) of learning and also generalized to untrained items.10.1093/brain/awy138_video1awy138media15796149281001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.