ArticleFamily practice2018
Daring to draw causal claims from non-randomized studies of primary care interventions.
Article in Family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal mediation analysis: what is it and how can it be used to inform practice and policy?Family practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Standardizing Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care Across Service Levels: Challenges in Demonstrating Effects in a Prospective Controlled Intervention Trial.Oncology and therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Rethinking the pros and cons of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the era of big data and advanced methods: a panel discussion.BMC proceedings · 2024Article
- Testing group differences for confounder selection in nonrandomized studies: flawed practice.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Difference-in-differences analysis and the propensity score to estimate the impact of non-randomized primary care interventions.Family practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.