Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912312›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2019

Aesthetic perceptions and psychosocial impact of malocclusion: comparison between cleft and non-cleft patients and their parents.

Sreevatsan Raghavan, Koshi Philip, Puneet Batra, Agneta Marcusson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Finnish Translation and Linguistic Validation of the CLEFT-Q Questionnaire.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Smoking in adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate: prevalence and associated factors.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sreevatsan RaghavanDepartment of Orthodontics, IDST, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Koshi PhilipDepartment of Orthodontics, Government Dental College, Thiruvanthapuram, Kerala, India.
Puneet BatraDepartment of Orthodontics at IDST, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Agneta MarcussonDentofacial Orthopedics, Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of dentofacial attractiveness using the 'Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire' (PIDAQ), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in patients with cleft lip/palate (CLP), and non-cleft orthodontic patients (Non-CLP) and their parents. Materials and methods: Eighty patients (aged 11-19 years) comprising 40 CLP and 40 non-CLP were administered the PIDAQ and SWLS questionnaires to be rated individually by the patients, along with IOTN-AC rated by the patients and their parents, respectively. The subjects were also sub-divided according to their age, i.e. pre-adolescent and adolescent. Results: The PIDAQ subpart scores for aesthetic concern differed between the two groups, with a significantly (P < 0.02) lower scoring for the CLP group. The adolescent CLP group scored more negatively than the pre-adolescent group in the dental self-confidence and social impact sub-parts of PIDAQ. No significant differences were observed for satisfaction with life. The parents' IOTN-AC score for both groups was significant (P < 0.05) greater than the patient's score, especially for adolescent subjects. Limitations: Non-condition specific questionnaires with restrictive sampling sizing and non-inclusion of parameters like stress coping mechanism etc. Conclusion: The parents rated the malocclusion of their child more critically than the child itself. A majority of the CLP group had a problem in identifying themselves using the IOTN-AC as no photo existed depicting a Class III or edge-to-edge malocclusion. Attitudes, especially perceptions of the aesthetics of front teeth, are crucial factors influencing patient's psychological self-concept, social confidence, and treatment need in CLP patients and non-CLP patients, having more relevance as the patient matures towards adolescence and adulthood.

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthCase-Control StudiesChildCleft LipCleft PalateFemaleHumansIndex of Orthodontic Treatment NeedMaleMalocclusionParentsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID29912312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.