Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29912270›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2018

Development of a Coding and Crosswalk Tool for Occupations and Industries.

Thomas Rémen, Lesley Richardson, Corinne Pilorget, Gilles Palmer, Jack Siemiatycki, Jérôme Lavoué

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas RémenHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub Department, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lesley RichardsonHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub Department, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Corinne PilorgetThe French Public Health Agency, rue du Val d'Osne Saint-Maurice, France.
Gilles PalmerFrench Center for Research and Development in Medical Informatics (CREDIM), ISPED, Université de Bordeaux, Rue Léo Saignat, Bordeaux, France.
Jack SiemiatyckiHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub Department, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Jérôme LavouéHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub Department, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Job coding into a standard occupation or industry classification is commonly performed in occupational epidemiology and occupational health. Sometimes, it is necessary to code jobs into multiple classifications or to convert job codes from one classification to another. We developed a generic tool, called CAPS-Canada (http://www.caps-canada.ca/), that combines a computer-assisted coding tool covering seven International, Canadian and US occupation and industry classifications and an assistant facilitating crosswalks from one classification to another. The objectives of this paper are to present the different functions of the CAPS-Canada tool and to assess their contribution through an inter-rater reliability study. Method: The crosswalk assistant was built based on a database of >30,000 jobs coded during a previous project. We evaluated to what extent it would allow automatic translation between pairs of classifications. The influence of CAPS-Canada on agreement between coders was assessed through an inter-rater reliability study comparing three approaches: manual coding, coding with CAPS-Canada without the crosswalk assistant, and coding with the complete tool. The material for this trial consisted of a random sample of 1000 jobs extracted from a case-control study and divided into three subgroups of equivalent size. Results: Across the classification systems, the crosswalk assistant would provide useful information for 83-99% of jobs (median 95%) in a population similar to ours. Eighteen to eighty-one percent of jobs (median 56%) could be entirely automatically recoded. Based on our sample of 1000 jobs, inter-rater reliability in occupation coding ranged from 35.7 to 66.5% (median 53.7%) depending on the combination of classification/resolution. Compared with manual coding, the use of CAPS-Canada substantially improved inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: CAPS-Canada is an attractive alternative to manual coding and is particularly relevant for coding a job into multiple classifications or for recoding jobs into other classifications.

Indexed as

IndustryCanadaCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualData CollectionElectronic Data ProcessingEpidemiologic MethodsHumansOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthOccupationsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID29912270
PMCPMC6093321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.