Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29911909›Full record

Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2018

Dentoalveolar effects produced by different appliances on early treatment of anterior open bite: A randomized clinical trial.

Paulo Henrique Rossato, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Flávia Diane Assis Urnau, Ana Cláudia de Castro, Ferreira Conti, Renato Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04338217 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Open-bite Bionator Versus the Removable Posterior Bite Plane With a Tongue Crib in the Early Treatment of Skeletal Anterior Open Bite: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsOpen BiteArmsBionator, Removable Appliance with Posterior Bite Planes
NCT07509567 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsAnterior Open BiteArmsConventional Palatal Crib, Bonded Spurs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Functional orthopedic treatment for anterior open bite in children. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Relapse of Anterior Open Bite: A Case Report.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulo Henrique Rossato
Thais Maria Freire Fernandes
Flávia Diane Assis Urnau
Ana Cláudia de Castro
Ferreira Conti
Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: To compare different appliances for early anterior open bite (AOB) correction. MATERIALS AND

methods: This was a parallel, randomized clinical trial. A prospective sample of patients with AOB was recruited consecutively. Eligibility criteria included angle class I malocclusion with AOB equal to or greater than 1 mm. Participants were allocated by simple randomization to 4 groups: bonded spurs, chin cup, fixed palatal crib, and removable palatal crib. Dentoalveolar changes among the groups were assessed by blinded observers by comparing lateral cephalograms taken before (T1) and 12 months after treatment (T2; analysis of variance followed by Tukey test). Of the measurements, 30% were reassessed for reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman agreement test; α = 5%; 95% confidence interval).

results: A total of 99 patients with a mean AOB of 3.7 mm (mean age 8.4 ± 0.8 years, both genders) were recruited. Dropouts occurred in all the groups, yielding a final sample size of 81 analyzed individuals. Intergroup comparisons of differences (T2-T1) showed significant differences for the incisor positioning variables (1.1, 1-PP, 6-PP, IMPA, 1.NB and 1-GoMe). However, there was no significant difference in AOB reduction among the groups, with an average correction of 3.1 mm.

conclusions: All of the tested devices promoted dental changes, especially in the anterior region, and contributed to AOB reduction during the study period. However, fixed palatal crib demonstrated greater impact on the positioning of the incisors.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessCephalometryChildFemaleHumansMaleOpen BiteOrthodontic AppliancesOrthodontics, InterceptiveToothInterceptive orthodonticsOpen biteOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID29911909
PMCPMC8174065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.