ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2018
Beyond the evoked/intrinsic neural process dichotomy.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Possibility Space Concept in Neuroscience: Possibilities, Constraints, and Explanations.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Exploring the transmission of cognitive task information through optimal brain pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Temporal imprecision of phase coherence in schizophrenia and psychosis-dynamic mechanisms and diagnostic marker.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Review
- Predicting executive functioning from brain networks: modality specificity and age effects.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Predicting Executive Functioning from Brain Networks: Modality Specificity and Age Effects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The arrow of time of brain signals in cognition: Potential intriguing role of parts of the default mode network.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Brain mechanisms of mental processing: from evoked and spontaneous brain activities to enactive brain activity.Psychoradiology · 2023Review
- Tangling with the Entangled Brain: Putting the Global Back into the Local.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- The Task Pre-Configuration Is Associated With Cognitive Performance Evidence From the Brain Synchrony.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Parkinson's disease is characterized by sub-second resting-state spatio-oscillatory patterns: A contribution from deep convolutional neural network.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Article
- Bring the Noise: Reconceptualizing Spontaneous Neural Activity.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020Review
- Epigenetic tuning of brain signal entropy in emergent human social behavior.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Metastable neural dynamics underlies cognitive performance across multiple behavioural paradigms.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Intrinsic connectome organization across temporal scales: New insights from cross-modal approaches.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Review
- Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- From eyes-closed to eyes-open: Role of cholinergic projections in EC-to-EO alpha reactivity revealed by combining EEG and MRI.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- Quantifying Differences Between Passive and Task-Evoked Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in a Large-Scale Brain Simulation.Brain connectivity · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary functional neuroimaging research has increasingly focused on characterization of intrinsic or "spontaneous" brain activity. Analysis of intrinsic activity is often contrasted with analysis of task-evoked activity that has traditionally been the focus of cognitive neuroscience. But does this evoked/intrinsic dichotomy adequately characterize human brain function? Based on empirical data demonstrating a close functional interdependence between intrinsic and task-evoked activity, we argue that the dichotomy between intrinsic and task-evoked activity as unobserved contributions to brain activity is artificial. We present an alternative picture of brain function in which the brain's spatiotemporal dynamics do not consist of separable intrinsic and task-evoked components, but reflect the enaction of a system of mutual constraints to move the brain into and out of task-appropriate functional configurations. According to this alternative picture, cognitive neuroscientists are tasked with describing both the temporal trajectory of brain activity patterns
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.