Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29911322›Full record

ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2018

Metagenomic insights into the roles of Proteobacteria in the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats.

Christina D Moon, Wayne Young, Paul H Maclean, Adrian L Cookson, Emma N Bermingham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diet, adiposity, and the gut microbiota from infancy to adolescence: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina D MoonAgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-9559
Wayne YoungAgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0464-2062
Paul H MacleanAgResearch, Lincoln Research Centre, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8898-8276
Adrian L CooksonAgResearch, Hopkirk Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-3386
Emma N BerminghamAgResearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0952-5260
AgResearch · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interests in the impact of the gastrointestinal microbiota on health and wellbeing have extended from humans to that of companion animals. While relatively fewer studies to date have examined canine and feline gut microbiomes, analysis of the metagenomic DNA from fecal communities using next-generation sequencing technologies have provided insights into the microbes that are present, their function, and potential to contribute to overall host nutrition and health. As carnivores, healthy dogs and cats possess fecal microbiomes that reflect the generally higher concentrations of protein and fat in their diets, relative to omnivores and herbivores. The phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are highly abundant, and Fusobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria also feature prominently. Proteobacteria is the most diverse bacterial phylum and commonly features in the fecal microbiota of healthy dogs and cats, although its reputation is often sullied as its members include a number of well-known opportunistic pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter, which may impact the health of the host and its owner. Furthermore, in other host species, high abundances of Proteobacteria have been associated with dysbiosis in hosts with metabolic or inflammatory disorders. In this review, we seek to gain further insight into the prevalence and roles of the Proteobacteria within the gastrointestinal microbiomes of healthy dogs and cats. We draw upon the growing number of metagenomic DNA sequence-based studies which now allow us take a culture-independent approach to examine the functions that this more minor, yet important, group contribute to normal microbiome function.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaCatsDogsFecesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomics16S rRNA genecaninefecal microbiomefelinemetagenomeProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID29911322
PMCPMC6182564
OpenAlexW2809253616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.