ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018
Clinical significance of perioperative changes in ankle-brachial index with regard to extremity-related outcome in non-diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the significance of perioperative changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI) with regard to extremity-related outcome in non-diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following revascularization.
methodsThe study represents a subanalysis of the multicentric Registry of First-line Treatment in Patients with CLI (CRITISCH). After exclusion of diabetic patients, conservative cases, and primary major amputation, 563 of 1200 CRITISCH patients (mean age 74 ± 10.7 years) were analyzed. This population was divided into two groups regarding perioperative ABI changes ∆ + 0.15 (Group 1) or ∆ - 0.15 (Group 2). Study endpoints were reintervention and major amputation during a mean follow-up of 14.6 ± 9 months. Logistic regression was performed in order to identify factors for ABI group affiliation.
resultsThere were 279 patients in Group 1 (49.5%) and 284 in Group 2 (51.5%). ABI sensitivity and specificity regarding vessel patency were calculated to be 54 and 87%. A preoperative ABI ≤ 0.4 [odds ratio (OR) 7.7], patent vessels at discharge (OR 12.2), and secondary interventions (OR 2.4) were identified as factors for Group 1 affiliation. Contrariwise, previous revascularization (OR 0.6), a glomerular filtration rate ≤ 15 ml/min/1.73 m
conclusionsFailure of perioperative ABI improvement is associated with a higher probability for amputation and should be valued as prognostic factor in non-diabetic patients with CLI. Patients with no/marginal improvement in ABI after revascularization require close follow-up monitoring and may benefit from early reintervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.