ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2018
Optimization of a microfluidics-based next generation sequencing assay for clinical oncology diagnostics.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Performance of a Rapid Digital PCR Test for the Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Variants.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024Article
- Primary mucosal melanomas of the head and neck are characterised by overexpression of the DNA mutating enzyme APOBEC3B.Histopathology · 2023Article
- Article
- Assessing acquired resistance to IDH1 inhibitor therapy by full-exonCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021Article
- Article
- In-Droplet Electrophoretic Separation and Enrichment of Biomolecules.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Analyses of molecular and histopathologic features and expression of PRAME by immunohistochemistry in mucosal melanomas.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMassively parallel, or next-generation, sequencing is a powerful technique for the assessment of somatic genomic alterations in cancer samples. Numerous gene targets can be interrogated simultaneously with a high degree of sensitivity. The clinical standard of care for many advanced solid and hematologic malignancies currently requires mutation analysis of several genes in the front-line setting, making focused next generation sequencing (NGS) assays an effective tool for clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories.
methodsWe have utilized an integrated microfluidics circuit (IFC) technology for multiplex PCR-based library preparation coupled with a bioinformatic method designed to enhance indel detection. A parallel low input PCR-based library preparation method was developed for challenging specimens with low DNA yield. Computational data filters were written to optimize analytic sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant variants.
resultsMinimum sequencing coverage and precision of variant calls were the two primary criteria used to establish minimum DNA mass input onto the IFC. Wet-bench and bioinformatics protocols were modified based on data from the optimization and familiarization process to improve assay performance. The NGS platform was then clinically validated for single nucleotide and indel (up to 93 base pair) variant detection with overall analytic accuracy of 98% (97% sensitivity; 100% specificity) using as little as 3 ng of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DNA or 0.3 ng of unfixed DNA.
conclusionsWe created a targeted clinical NGS assay for common solid and hematologic cancers with high sensitivity, high specificity, and the flexibility to test very limited tissue samples often encountered in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.