Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29911110›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2018

Optimization of a microfluidics-based next generation sequencing assay for clinical oncology diagnostics.

Christine Henzler, Matthew Schomaker, Rendong Yang, Aaron P Lambert, Rebecca LaRue, Robyn Kincaid, Kenneth Beckman, Teresa Kemmer, Jon Wilson, Sophia Yohe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing acquired resistance to IDH1 inhibitor therapy by full-exonCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021
    Article
  6. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Analyses of molecular and histopathologic features and expression of PRAME by immunohistochemistry in mucosal melanomas.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christine HenzlerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Matthew SchomakerM Health University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rendong YangResearch Informatics Solutions, Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Aaron P LambertM Health University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Rebecca LaRueDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Robyn KincaidM Health University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kenneth BeckmanUniversity of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Teresa KemmerM Health University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jon WilsonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sophia YoheDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Bharat ThyagarajanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Andrew C NelsonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassively parallel, or next-generation, sequencing is a powerful technique for the assessment of somatic genomic alterations in cancer samples. Numerous gene targets can be interrogated simultaneously with a high degree of sensitivity. The clinical standard of care for many advanced solid and hematologic malignancies currently requires mutation analysis of several genes in the front-line setting, making focused next generation sequencing (NGS) assays an effective tool for clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories.

methodsWe have utilized an integrated microfluidics circuit (IFC) technology for multiplex PCR-based library preparation coupled with a bioinformatic method designed to enhance indel detection. A parallel low input PCR-based library preparation method was developed for challenging specimens with low DNA yield. Computational data filters were written to optimize analytic sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant variants.

resultsMinimum sequencing coverage and precision of variant calls were the two primary criteria used to establish minimum DNA mass input onto the IFC. Wet-bench and bioinformatics protocols were modified based on data from the optimization and familiarization process to improve assay performance. The NGS platform was then clinically validated for single nucleotide and indel (up to 93 base pair) variant detection with overall analytic accuracy of 98% (97% sensitivity; 100% specificity) using as little as 3 ng of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DNA or 0.3 ng of unfixed DNA.

conclusionsWe created a targeted clinical NGS assay for common solid and hematologic cancers with high sensitivity, high specificity, and the flexibility to test very limited tissue samples often encountered in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

computational biologymedical oncologyMolecular sequence datamolecular targeted therapypathology

Identifiers

PMID29911110
PMCPMC5985273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.