Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910969›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2018

Optimized JPEG 2000 Compression for Efficient Storage of Histopathological Whole-Slide Images.

Henrik Helin, Teemu Tolonen, Onni Ylinen, Petteri Tolonen, Juha Näpänkangas, Jorma Isola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Automated Curation and AI Workflow Management System for Digital Pathology.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An automatic whole-slide hyperspectral imaging microscope.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik HelinBioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Teemu TolonenDepartment of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Onni YlinenBioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Petteri TolonenBioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Juha NäpänkangasDepartment of Pathology, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jorma IsolaBioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FIOulu University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole slide images (WSIs, digitized histopathology glass slides) are large data files whose long-term storage remains a significant cost for pathology departments. Currently used WSI formats are based on lossy image compression alogrithms, either using JPEG or its more efficient successor JPEG 2000. While the advantages of the JPEG 2000 algorithm (JP2) are commonly recognized, its compression parameters have not been fully optimized for pathology WSIs.

methodsWe defined an optimized parametrization for JPEG 2000 image compression, designated JP2-WSI, to be used specifically with histopathological WSIs. Our parametrization is based on allowing a very high degree of compression on the background part of the WSI while using a conventional amount of compression on the tissue-containing part of the image, resulting in high overall compression ratios.

resultsWhen comparing the compression power of JP2-WSI to the commonly used fixed 35:1 compression ratio JPEG 2000 and the default image formats of proprietary Aperio, Hamamatsu, and 3DHISTECH scanners, JP2-WSI produced the smallest file sizes and highest overall compression ratios for all 17 slides tested. The image quality, as judged by visual inspection and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) measurements, was equal to or better than the compared image formats. The average file size by JP2-WSI amounted to 15, 9, and 16 percent, respectively, of the file sizes of the three commercial scanner vendors' proprietary file formats (3DHISTECH MRXS, Aperio SVS, and Hamamatsu NDPI). In comparison to the commonly used 35:1 compressed JPEG 2000, JP2-WSI was three times more efficient.

conclusionsJP2-WSI allows very efficient and cost-effective data compression for whole slide images without loss of image information required for histopathological diagnosis.

Indexed as

Digital pathologyimage compressionJPEG 2000virtual microscopywhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID29910969
PMCPMC5989536
OpenAlexW2803571152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.