Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910718›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Multichannel Investigation of Interoception: Sensitivity Is Not a Generalizable Feature.

Eszter Ferentzi, Tamás Bogdány, Zsuzsanna Szabolcs, Barbara Csala, Áron Horváth, Ferenc Köteles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. There is no such thing as interoception.Frontiers in psychology · 2025
    Article
  15. Perceptual Dysfunction in Eating Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The neurobiology of interoception and affect.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eszter FerentziDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás BogdányInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna SzabolcsDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Barbara CsalaDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Áron HorváthInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc KötelesInstitute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

balancebitter tasteheartbeat perceptioninteroceptioninteroceptive sensitivitypainwater load test

Identifiers

PMID29910718
PMCPMC5992275
OpenAlexW2806929888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.