Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910715›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Evaluating Pro- and Re-Active Driving Behavior by Means of the EEG.

Edmund Wascher, Stefan Arnau, Ingmar Gutberlet, Melanie Karthaus, Stephan Getzmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edmund WascherIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Stefan ArnauIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Ingmar GutberletBlindSight GmbH, Schlitz, Germany.
Melanie KarthausIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Stephan GetzmannIfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traffic safety essentially depends on the drivers' alertness and vigilance, especially in monotonous or demanding driving situations. Brain oscillatory EEG activity offers insight into a drivers' mental state and has therefore attracted much attention in the past. However, EEG measures do not only vary with internal factors like attentional engagement and vigilance but might also interact with external factors like time on task, task demands, or the degree to which a traffic situation is predictable. In order to identify EEG parameters for cognitive mechanisms involved in tasks of high and low controllability, the present study investigated the interaction of time on task, task load, and cognitive controllability in simulated driving scenarios, using an either re-active or pro-active driving task. Participants performed a lane-keeping task, half of them compensating varying levels of crosswind (re-active task), and the other half driving along a winding road (pro-active task). Both driving tasks were adjusted with respect to difficulty. The analysis of oscillatory EEG parameters showed an increase in total power (1-30 Hz) with time on task, with decreasing task load, and in the re-active compared to the pro-active task. Furthermore, the relative power in Alpha band increased with decreasing task load and time on task, while relative Theta power showed the opposite pattern. Moreover, relative Alpha power was also higher in the re-active, than pro-active, driving situation, an effect that even increased with time on task. The results demonstrate that the controllability of a driving situation has a similar effect on oscillatory EEG activity like time on task and task load.

Indexed as

alpha and theta powercar drivingcognitive controllabilityEEGmental fatigue

Identifiers

PMID29910715
PMCPMC5992432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.