Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910704›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

How to Build a Functional Connectomic Biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairment From Source Reconstructed MEG Resting-State Activity: The Combination of ROI Representation and Connectivity Estimator Matters.

Stavros I Dimitriadis, María E López, Ricardo Bruña, Pablo Cuesta, Alberto Marcos, Fernando Maestú, Ernesto Pereda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stavros I DimitriadisDivision of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
María E LópezDepartment of Basic Psychology II, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo BruñaDepartment of Basic Psychology II, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo CuestaLaboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto MarcosDepartment of Neurology, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando MaestúDepartment of Basic Psychology II, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ernesto PeredaLaboratory of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Madrid, Spain.
Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ESCardiff University · GBHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K004360/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our work aimed to demonstrate the combination of machine learning and graph theory for the designing of a connectomic biomarker for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects using eyes-closed neuromagnetic recordings. The whole analysis based on source-reconstructed neuromagnetic activity. As ROI representation, we employed the principal component analysis (PCA) and centroid approaches. As representative bi-variate connectivity estimators for the estimation of intra and cross-frequency interactions, we adopted the phase locking value (PLV), the imaginary part (iPLV) and the correlation of the envelope (CorrEnv). Both intra and cross-frequency interactions (CFC) have been estimated with the three connectivity estimators within the seven frequency bands (intra-frequency) and in pairs (CFC), correspondingly. We demonstrated how different versions of functional connectivity graphs single-layer (SL-FCG) and multi-layer (ML-FCG) can give us a different view of the functional interactions across the brain areas. Finally, we applied machine learning techniques with main scope to build a reliable connectomic biomarker by analyzing both SL-FCG and ML-FCG in two different options: as a whole unit using a tensorial extraction algorithm and as single pair-wise coupling estimations. We concluded that edge-weighed feature selection strategy outperformed the tensorial treatment of SL-FCG and ML-FCG. The highest classification performance was obtained with the centroid ROI representation and edge-weighted analysis of the SL-FCG reaching the 98% for the CorrEnv in α

Indexed as

connectome data analysisconnectomic biomarkercross-frequency-couplingintrinsic coupling modesmagnetoencephalographymild cognitive impairmentmultiplexityvirtual source activity

Identifiers

PMID29910704
PMCPMC5992286
OpenAlexW2805950779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.