ArticleJournal of pain research2018
Clinimetric properties of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) for aged-care residents with moderate to severe dementia.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06049732 (Psychometric Evaluation of the Electronic Pain Assessment Tool PainChek® Adult in Nursing Homes in the United States), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Psychometric Evaluation of the Electronic Pain Assessment Tool PainChek® Adult in Nursing Homes in the United States
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital decoding of the multidimensional pain experience in people living with dementia.Age and ageing · 2026Observational
- Digital Approaches to Pain Assessment Across Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pain in people with dementia is a significant contributor to increased professional caregiver burden: results of an observation study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Care professionals' perceptions of the use of PainChekBMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Automated pain detection using facial expression in adult patients with a customized spatial temporal attention long short-term memory (STA-LSTM) network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the psychometric properties of PainChek in older general hospital patients with dementia.Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Pain prevalence, intensity, and association with neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia in immigrant and non-immigrant aged care residents in Australia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Behaviours and psychological symptoms of childhood dementia: two cases of psychosocial interventions.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Technology-guided assessment of vocalisations and their diagnostic value as pain indicators for people living with dementia.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Article
- Pharmacological management of chronic non-cancer pain in frail older people.Australian prescriber · 2022Review
- Faces of Pain in Dementia: Learnings From a Real-World Study Using a Technology-Enabled Pain Assessment Tool.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pain Assessment for Individuals with Advanced Dementia in Care Homes: A Systematic Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of PainChek® in UK Aged Care Residents with advanced dementia.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Article
- Medical Diagnostic Tests: A Review of Test Anatomy, Phases, and Statistical Treatment of Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Review
- A Technical Note on the PainChek™ System: A Web Portal and Mobile Medical Device for Assessing Pain in People With Dementia.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2018Article
- The Impact of Dementia on Patients with Hip Fracture.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Article
- Commentary on Pain Behaviors in Dementia: Letter to the Editor with Reference to the Article by Morrison et al. (2020).Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate pain assessment is critical to detect pain and facilitate effective pain management in dementia patients. The electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) is a point-of-care solution that uses automated facial analysis in conjunction with other clinical indicators to evaluate the presence and intensity of pain in patients with dementia. This study aimed to examine clini-metric properties (clinical utility and predictive validity) of the ePAT in this population group.
methodsData were extracted from a prospective validation (observational) study of the ePAT in dementia patients who were ≥65 years of age, living in a facility for ≥3 months, and had Psychogeriatric Assessment Scales - cognitive scores ≥10. The study was conducted in two residential aged-care facilities in Perth, Western Australia, where residents were sampled using purposive convenience strategy. Predictive validity was measured using accuracy statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value). Positive and negative clinical utility index (CUI) scores were calculated using Mitchell's formula. Calculations were based on comparison with the Abbey Pain Scale, which was used as a criterion reference.
resultsA total of 400 paired pain assessments for 34 residents (mean age 85.5±6.3 years, range 68.0-93.2 years) with moderate-severe dementia (Psychogeriatric Assessment Scales - cognitive score 11-21) were included in the analysis. Of those, 303 episodes were classified as pain by the ePAT based on a cutoff score of 7. Unadjusted prevalence findings were sensitivity 96.1% (95% CI 93.9%-98.3%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 85.7%-97.1%), accuracy 95.0% (95% CI 92.9%-97.1%), positive predictive value 97.4% (95% CI 95.6%-99.2%), negative predictive value 87.6% (95% CI 81.1%-94.2%), CUI
conclusionThe clinimetric properties demonstrated were excellent, thus supporting the clinical usefulness of the ePAT when identifying pain in patients with moderate-severe dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.