Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910540›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2018

High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Children with Respiratory Distress.

Punthila Sitthikarnkha, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Nuanchan Prapphal, Jitladda Deerojanawong, Suchada Sritippayawan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Comparison of Oxygen Delivery Devices in Postoperative Patients with Hypoxemia: An Open-labeled Randomized Controlled Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Punthila SitthikarnkhaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Rujipat SamransamruajkitDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nuanchan PrapphalDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Jitladda DeerojanawongDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Suchada SritippayawanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to determine the clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared with conventional oxygen therapy in children presented with respiratory distress. STUDY

designThis was a randomized controlled study. MATERIALS AND

methodsInfants and children aged between 1 month to 5 years who were admitted to our tertiary referral center for respiratory distress (July 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015) and met the inclusion criteria were recruited.

interventionsInfants and children hospitalized with respiratory distress were randomized into two groups of interventions. All clinical data, for example, respiratory score, pulse rate, and respiratory rate were recorded. The results were subsequently analyzed.

resultsA total of 98 respiratory distress children were enrolled during the study period. Only 4 children (8.2%) failed in HFNC therapy, compared with 10 children (20.4%) in conventional oxygen therapy group (

conclusionHFNC therapy revealed a potential clinical advantage in management children hospitalized with respiratory distress compared with conventional respiratory therapy. The early use of HFNC in children with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress may prevent endotracheal tube intubation. TRIAL REGISTER: TCTR 20170222007.

Indexed as

Childrenconventional oxygenhigh flow nasal cannulaintubationrespiratory distress

Identifiers

PMID29910540
PMCPMC5971639
OpenAlexW2803833643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.