Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29910278›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Reliability and Validity of the Early Years Physical Activity Questionnaire (EY-PAQ).

Daniel D Bingham, Paul J Collings, Stacy A Clemes, Silvia Costa, Gillian Santorelli, Paula Griffiths, Sally E Barber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Dietary and social predictors of PFAS exposure in Hispanic children from Northern Virginia.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validity of the PROMISThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel D BinghamBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. daniel.bingham@bthft.nhs.uk.
Paul J CollingsBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. Paul.Collings@bthft.nhs.uk.
Stacy A ClemesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. S.A.Clemes@lboro.ac.uk.
Silvia CostaCentre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. sc808@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-6711
Gillian SantorelliBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. Gillian.Santorelli@bthft.nhs.uk.
Paula GriffithsSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. P.Griffiths@lboro.ac.uk.
Sally E BarberBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK. sally.barber@bthft.nhs.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST) in young children (<5 years) is complex. Objective measures have high validity but require specialist expertise, are expensive, and can be burdensome for participants. A proxy-report instrument for young children that accurately measures PA and ST is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Early Years Physical Activity Questionnaire (EY-PAQ). In a setting where English and Urdu are the predominant languages spoken by parents of young children, a sample of 196 parents and their young children (mean age 3.2 ± 0.8 years) from Bradford, UK took part in the study. A total of 156 (79.6%) questionnaires were completed in English and 40 (20.4%) were completed in transliterated Urdu. A total of 109 parents took part in the reliability aspect of the study, which involved completion of the EY-PAQ on two occasions (7.2 days apart; standard deviation (SD) = 1.1). All 196 participants took part in the validity aspect which involved comparison of EY-PAQ scores against accelerometry. Validty anaylsis used all data and data falling with specific MVPA and ST boundaries. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlations (ICC) and validity by Bland⁻Altman plots and rank correlation coefficients. The test re-test reliability of the EY-PAQ was moderate for ST (ICC = 0.47) and fair for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)(ICC = 0.35). The EY-PAQ had poor agreement with accelerometer-determined ST (mean difference = -87.5 min·day

Indexed as

accelerometrychildrenethnicitymeasurementphysical activitypreschoolsedentary behaviourself-report

Identifiers

PMID29910278
PMCPMC5968919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.