ArticleEmergency radiology2018
Imaging of Kingella kingae musculoskeletal infections in children: a series of 5 cases.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A narrative review of our developing knowledge about paediatric spondylodiscitis based on existing literature.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Acute osteoarticular infections in children are frequently forgotten multidiscipline emergencies: beyond the technical skills.EFORT open reviews · 2021Review
- Vertical Stratification in Urban Green Space Aerobiomes.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
- Systematic Review ofPediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2020Review
- TheFrontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeKingella kingae musculoskeletal infections continue to be under-diagnosed and there remains a paucity of literature on its imaging features. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings of microbiology-proven K. kingae infections. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of musculoskeletal infections between January 1, 2013 and Dec 31, 2016 yielded 134 patients from whom 5 patients had confirmed K. kingae infections (3 boys and 2 girls, mean age of 16 months, range 9-38 months). Picture archiving and communication system and electronic medical records were reviewed.
resultsAt presentation, none of the patients had a fever and not all patients had abnormal inflammatory markers. Three patients had septic arthritis (2 knee and 1 sternomanubrial joints), one had epiphyseal osteomyelitis, and one had lumbar spondylodiscitis. The case of epiphyseal osteomyelitis of the distal humerus also had elbow joint involvement. A combination of radiography (n = 4), ultrasound (n = 2), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n = 5) were performed. Prominent synovial thickening was observed for both knee and elbow joints and extensive regional myositis for all except for the patient with sternomanubrial joint infection. The diagnosis of K. kingae infection resulted in a change in the antibiotic regimen in 80% of the patients.
conclusionDisproportionate synovial thickening, prominent peri-articular myositis, and/or characteristic sites of involvement demonstrating imaging features of infection or inflammation in a young child with mild infectious symptoms and elevated inflammatory markers should invoke the possibility of an underlying K. kingae infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.