Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29909568›Full record

SynthesisMolecular diagnosis & therapy2018

Association Between CHEK2*1100delC and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mingming Liang, Yun Zhang, Chenyu Sun, Feras Kamel Rizeq, Min Min, Tingting Shi, Yehuan Sun

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Rare solid tumours as indicators of hereditary cancer syndromes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Short Report: The Variants inJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cells · 2020
    Review
  18. Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingming LiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Yun ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Chenyu SunThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, China.
Feras Kamel RizeqAvalon University School of Medicine, Santa Rosaweg 122 - 124, Willemstad, Curaçao.
Min MinDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Tingting ShiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Yehuan SunDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China. yhsun_ahmu_edu@yeah.net.ORCID 0000-0002-8651-8059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe association between the checkpoint kinase 2*1100delC (CHEK2*1100delC) and breast cancer has been extensively explored.

objectiveIn light of the recent publication of studies on these specific findings, particularly regarding male patients with breast cancer, we performed an updated meta-analysis to investigate a more reliable estimate.

methodsThis meta-analysis included 26 published studies selected in a search of electronic databases up to January 2018, including 118,735 breast cancer cases and 195,807 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between 1100delC and breast cancer.

resultsMeta-analysis results suggested that 1100delC contributed to an increased breast cancer risk in overall populations (OR 2.89; 95% CI 2.63-3.16). Subgroup analysis found ORs of 3.13 (95% CI 1.94-5.07) for male breast cancer, 2.88 (95% CI 2.63-3.16) for female breast cancer, 2.87 (95% CI 1.85-4.47) for early-onset breast cancer, 2.92 (95% CI 2.65-3.22) for invasive breast cancer, and 3.21 (95% CI 2.41-4.29) for familial breast cancer. The sensitivity analysis suggested that results of this meta-analysis were generally robust.

conclusionCHEK2*1100delC is associated with an increased risk of both female and male breast cancer.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseSequence DeletionAllelesBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCheckpoint Kinase 2FemaleGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansMaleOdds RatioPublication BiasRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.