ArticlePsychopharmacology2018
Contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination in cannabis users.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Cannabidiol Use on Visual Function and Optical Quality: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Trial
- Visual function and vehicle driving performance under the effects of cannabidiol: A randomized cross-over experiment.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Trial
- Behavioral and Self-Report Cognitive Impairment Differences between Fast-Acting, Standard, and Placebo Cannabis Edibles.Research square · 2026Article
- Motion and form perception in healthy individuals with adolescent cannabis use.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Adverse Ocular Impact and Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Brain reward function in people who use cannabis: a systematic review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Review
- Effects of High-Potency Cannabis on Psychomotor Performance in Frequent Cannabis Users.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2022Article
- Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective effects, and blood THC concentrations following acute administration of oral and vaporized cannabis.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Presence of the Endocannabinoid System in the Inferior Pulvinar of the Vervet Monkey.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Aggressive Driving Behaviours in Cannabis Users. The Influence of Consumer Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Effects of cannabis on visual function and self-perceived visual quality.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Effects of Smoking Cannabis on Visual Function and Driving Performance. A Driving-Simulator Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- "But that is your opinion": the dark side of postmodern pain medicine creating a postmodern patient autonomy.Journal of pain research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleCannabis use impairs visual attention; however, it is unclear whether cannabis use also impairs low level visual processing or whether low level visual deficits can be related to lower dopaminergic functioning found in cannabis users.
objectivesTo investigate whether spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination under normal and low luminance conditions differ in cannabis users and non-users.
methodsControl (n = 20) and cannabis (n = 21) participants completed a visual acuity test, a saliva test and self-report measures. Spatial and temporal contrast thresholds, motion coherence thresholds for translational and radial motion and the spontaneous eye blink rate were then collected.
resultsCannabis users showed decreased spatial contrast sensitivity under low luminance conditions and increased motion coherence thresholds under all luminance levels tested compared to non-users. No differences in temporal contrast sensitivity were found between the groups. Frequency of cannabis use correlated significantly and negatively with contrast sensitivity, both spatial and temporal, in the cannabis group and higher motion coherence thresholds for radial motion were also associated with more frequent cannabis use in this group. The eye blink rate was significantly lower in cannabis users compared to non-users.
conclusionsThe present study shows that cannabis use is associated with deficits in low level visual processing. Such deficits are suggested to relate to lower dopamine, in a similar manner as in clinical populations. The implications for driving safety under reduced visibility (e.g. night) in abstaining cannabis users are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.