Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29909427›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2018

Contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination in cannabis users.

Elena Mikulskaya, Frances Heritage Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aggressive Driving Behaviours in Cannabis Users. The Influence of Consumer Characteristics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Smoking Cannabis on Visual Function and Driving Performance. A Driving-Simulator Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elena MikulskayaSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.
Frances Heritage MartinSchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia. Frances.Martin@newcastle.edu.au.
Hunter Water · AU

Funding

University of Tasmania G1201204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCannabis use impairs visual attention; however, it is unclear whether cannabis use also impairs low level visual processing or whether low level visual deficits can be related to lower dopaminergic functioning found in cannabis users.

objectivesTo investigate whether spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and motion discrimination under normal and low luminance conditions differ in cannabis users and non-users.

methodsControl (n = 20) and cannabis (n = 21) participants completed a visual acuity test, a saliva test and self-report measures. Spatial and temporal contrast thresholds, motion coherence thresholds for translational and radial motion and the spontaneous eye blink rate were then collected.

resultsCannabis users showed decreased spatial contrast sensitivity under low luminance conditions and increased motion coherence thresholds under all luminance levels tested compared to non-users. No differences in temporal contrast sensitivity were found between the groups. Frequency of cannabis use correlated significantly and negatively with contrast sensitivity, both spatial and temporal, in the cannabis group and higher motion coherence thresholds for radial motion were also associated with more frequent cannabis use in this group. The eye blink rate was significantly lower in cannabis users compared to non-users.

conclusionsThe present study shows that cannabis use is associated with deficits in low level visual processing. Such deficits are suggested to relate to lower dopamine, in a similar manner as in clinical populations. The implications for driving safety under reduced visibility (e.g. night) in abstaining cannabis users are discussed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionBlinkingContrast SensitivityFemaleHallucinogensHumansMaleMarijuana UseMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationSalivaSensory ThresholdsVisual AcuityYoung AdultHallucinogensCannabis useContrast sensitivityLow luminanceRadial motionSpontaneous Eye Blink Rate (SEBR)Translational motion

Identifiers

PMID29909427
OpenAlexW2808309759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.