ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018
Prevalence and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term and long-term outcomes of revascularization interventions for patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of physician's sex/gender on processes of care, and clinical outcomes in cardiac operative care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative Outcomes of Heart Failure with Preserved vs. Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Identification of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Substrate in Cardiac Surgery Patients.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025Review
- Perioperative Considerations of Novel Antidiabetic Agents in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sex-related differences in systemic inflammatory response and outcomes after cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Predicting outcomes in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Gender Effect on Clinical Profiles, Pharmacological Treatments and Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with coronary heart disease in Jilin Province, China: a cross-sectional study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2023Article
- Review
- The metabolic score for insulin resistance in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
- Mortality across the spectrum of hemoglobin level in patients undergoing surgical coronary revascularization.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Derivation and validation of predictive indices for cardiac readmission after coronary and valvular surgery - A multicenter study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Tree-based survival analysis improves mortality prediction in cardiac surgery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Sex-specific differences and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive and sternotomy valve surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022Article
- Association Between Handover of Anesthesiology Care and 1-Year Mortality Among Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Perioperative changes in left ventricular systolic function following surgical revascularization.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (rEF) is a widely regarded prognosticator after coronary artery bypass grafting. HF with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) accounts for up to half of all HF cases and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in hospitalized cohorts. However, HFpEF outcomes have not been elucidated in cardiac surgical patients. We investigated the prevalence and outcomes of HFpEF and HFrEF in women and men following coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS AND
resultsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, between October 1, 2008, and March 31, 2015, using Cardiac Care Network and Canadian Institute of Health Information data. HF is captured through a validated population-based database of all Ontarians with physician-diagnosed HF. We defined pEF as ejection fraction ≥50% and rEF as ejection fraction <50%. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analyses were stratified by sex. Mortality rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. The relative hazard of death was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Of 40 083 patients (20.6% women), 55.5% had pEF without HF, 25.7% had rEF without HF, 6.9% had HFpEF, and 12.0% had HFrEF. Age-standardized HFpEF mortality rates at 4±2 years of follow-up were similar in women and men. HFrEF standardized HFpEF mortality rates were higher in women than men.
conclusionsWe found a higher prevalence and poorer prognosis of HFpEF in women. A history of HF was a more important prognosticator than ejection fraction. Preoperative screening and extended postoperative follow-up should be focused on women and men with HF rather than on rEF alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.