ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2019
Myths, facts and controversies in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis.
Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- A protocol proposal for safe dental anaesthesia in paediatric patients with allergic backgrounds: insights from a case series of allergic patients.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Contact Urticaria and Related Conditions: Clinical Review.Contact dermatitis · 2025Review
- Anaphylaxis severity grade, during oral food challenges, assessed by five different classifications.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Observational
- Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Review
- Trends in Anaphylaxis Hospitalizations among Adults in Spain and Their Relationship with Asthma-Analysis of Hospital Discharge data from 2016 to 2021.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Anaphylaxis and allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: A narrative review of characteristics and potential obstacles on achieving herd immunity.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests caused by anaphylaxis and factors associated with outcomes: an observational study.BMJ open · 2022Observational
- Risk stratification through allergy history: single-centre experience of specialized COVID-19 vaccine clinic.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022Article
- Anaphylaxis in Omani Patients: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center.Oman medical journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Physicians' knowledge and practice concerning diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis: The situation in Egypt.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021Article
- Improving Severity Scoring of Food-Induced Allergic Reactions: A Global "Best-Worst Scaling" Exercise.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021Article
- EAACI statement on the diagnosis, management and prevention of severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.Allergy · 2021Article
- Updated anaphylaxis guidelines: management in infants and children.Australian prescriber · 2021Review
- Infant Anaphylaxis: A Diagnostic Challenge.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2021Review
- Practical handling of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines: A position paper from German and Austrian Allergy Societies AeDA, DGAKI, GPA and ÖGAI.Allergo journal international · 2021Article
- Allergo Journal : interdisziplinare Zeitschrift fur Allergologie und Umweltmedizin : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allergie- und Immunitatsforschung · 2021Review
- [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Colon Ischaemia Induced by Amoxicillin-related Anaphylactic Shock.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2021Article
- World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a serious systemic allergic reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause death. Despite numerous national and international guidelines and consensus statements, common misconceptions still persist in terms of diagnosis and appropriate management, both among healthcare professionals and patient/carers. We address some of these misconceptions and highlight the optimal approach for patients who experience potentially life-threatening allergic reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.