Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29908451›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2018

Inhibitors of protein-protein interactions (PPIs): an analysis of scaffold choices and buried surface area.

Xu Ran, Jason E Gestwicki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New inhibitors of themSphere · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. In Silico Druggability Assessment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Hot-Spot-Guided Generative Deep Learning for Drug-Like PPI Inhibitor Design.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xu RanInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Jason E GestwickiInstitute for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States. Electronic address: jason.gestwicki@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Molecular Chaperones and Small MoleculesR01NS059690 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jason E Gestwicki · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPI) were once considered 'undruggable', but clinical successes, driven by advanced methods in drug discovery, have challenged that notion. Here, we review the last three years of literature on PPI inhibitors to understand what is working and why. From the 66 recently reported PPI inhibitors, we found that the average molecular weight was significantly greater than 500Da, but that this trend was driven, in large part, by the contribution of peptide-based compounds. Despite differences in average molecular weight, we found that compounds based on small molecules or peptides were almost equally likely to be potent inhibitors (K

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug DiscoveryHumansPeptidesProtein BindingProtein Interaction MapsProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesPeptidesProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID29908451
PMCPMC6066447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.