Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29908310›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Individual differences in aesthetic engagement are reflected in resting-state fMRI connectivity: Implications for stress resilience.

Paula G Williams, Kimberley T Johnson, Brian J Curtis, Jace B King, Jeffrey S Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Misophonia reactions in the general population are correlated with strong emotional reactions to other everyday sensory-emotional experiences.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Aesthetic experience models human learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula G WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: paula.williams@psych.utah.edu.
Kimberley T JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Brian J CurtisDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Jace B KingProgram in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Jeffrey S AndersonProgram in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Atypical Late Neurodevelopment in Autism: A Longitudinal MRI and DTI StudyR01MH080826 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LAINHART, JANET ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2020
$6.5M
Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma 3T MRI scannerS10OD018482 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKER, DENNIS L · 2015 to 2015
$1.2M
NIH HHS 1U54MH091657NIH HHS R01 MH080826NIH HHS S10 OD018482NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080826NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndividual differences in aesthetic engagement-the propensity to be moved by art, nature, and beauty-are associated with positive health outcomes, as well as stress resilience. The purpose of the current study was to identify potential neural substrate mechanisms underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement and reported proneness to aesthetic chill.

methodsData from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) 1200 Subjects Release were utilized. Resting-state fMRI connectivity was extracted for 361 regions in the brain including cortical, subcortical and cerebellar regions for each participant, using participant-specific segmentation and parcellation of subcortical gray matter nuclei and a network-based statistics analytical approach. The Aesthetic Interests subcluster of the Openness to Experience scale (NEO-Five Factor Inventory; NEO-FFI) was used to characterize individual differences in aesthetic engagement and chill.

resultsParticipants reporting higher aesthetic engagement, particularly proneness to aesthetic chill responses, exhibited significantly higher connectivity between the default network and sensory and motor cortices, higher connectivity between the ventral default and salience networks, and decreased connectivity between the cerebellum and somatomotor cortex.

conclusionsCurrent findings suggest that greater integration of the default mode network, involving processing of internal narrative, with neural representations of sensory perception and salience detection may be a mechanism underlying individual differences in aesthetic engagement. Thus, these individual differences may reflect general integration of environmental perception with internal emotional experience, which in turn may facilitate comfort with novelty, self-regulation, and positive adaptation to potentially stressful experiences.

Indexed as

EstheticsIndividualityResilience, PsychologicalAdultBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysRestStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultAestheticsfMRIOpenness to experienceResting state functional connectivityStress resilience

Identifiers

PMID29908310
PMCPMC6410354
OpenAlexW2807737703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.