Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29908039›Full record

Trial reportActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2019

No neurodevelopmental benefit of cerebral oximetry in the first randomised trial (SafeBoosC II) in preterm infants during the first days of life.

Anne M Plomgaard, Thomas Alderliesten, Frank van Bel, Manon Benders, Olivier Claris, Malaika Cordeiro, Eugene Dempsey, Monica Fumagalli, Christian Gluud, Simon Hyttel-Sorensen and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monitoring and evaluation of hypotension in the extremely preterm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Anne M PlomgaardDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1009-6013
Thomas AlderliestenWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank van BelWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Manon BendersWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Olivier ClarisDepartment of Neonatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
Malaika CordeiroDepartment of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Eugene DempseyINFANT Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Monica FumagalliNICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon Hyttel-SorensenDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Petra LemmersWilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Adelina PellicerDepartment of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Gerhard PichlerDepartment of Pediatrics, Research Unit for Neonatal Micro- and Macrocirculation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHospital Universitario La Paz · ESMedical University of Graz · ATUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Danish Council for Strategic Research 0603-00482B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCerebral hypoxia has been associated with neurodevelopmental impairment. We studied whether reducing cerebral hypoxia in extremely preterm infants during the first 72 hours of life affected neurological outcomes at two years of corrected age.

methodsIn 2012-2013, the phase II randomised Safeguarding the Brains of our smallest Children trial compared visible cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring in an intervention group and blinded NIRS monitoring in a control group. Cerebral hypoxia was significantly reduced in the intervention group. We followed up 115 survivors from eight European centres at two years of corrected age, by conducting a medical examination and assessing their neurodevelopment with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Second or Third Edition, and the parental Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ).

resultsThere were no differences between the intervention (n = 65) and control (n = 50) groups with regard to the mean mental developmental index (89.6 ± 19.5 versus 88.4 ± 14.7, p = 0.77), ASQ score (215 ± 58 versus 213 ± 58, p = 0.88) and the number of children with moderate-to-severe neurodevelopmental impairment (10 versus six, p = 0.58).

conclusionCerebral NIRS monitoring was not associated with long-term benefits or harm with regard to neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of corrected age.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolFemaleHumansHypoxia, BrainInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersOximetrySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAges and stages questionnaireBayley scales of infant and toddler developmentCerebral near-infrared spectroscopyExtremely preterm infantsNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID29908039
PMCPMC6585779
OpenAlexW2807866825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.