Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29907787›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2018

Assessing the accuracy of intracameral phenylephrine preparation in cataract surgery.

Stuart Guthrie, Thomas Jensen, Richard C Hartley, Kanna Ramaesh, David Lockington

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome: Updated Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart GuthrieTennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
Thomas JensenWestCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6343-2730
Richard C HartleyWestCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Kanna RamaeshTennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
David LockingtonTennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK. davidlockington@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-0958
Gartnavel General Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnpreserved phenylephrine is often used as an off-licence intracameral surgical adjunct during cataract surgery to assist with pupil dilation and/or stabilise the iris in floppy iris syndrome. It can be delivered as a neat 0.2 ml bolus of either 2.5 or 10% strength, or in a range of ad-hoc dilutions. We wished to assess the accuracy of intracameral phenylephrine preparation in clinical practice.

methodsPhenylephrine 0.2 ml was analysed both neat (2.5 and 10%) and in diluted form (ratio of 1:1 and 1:3). Samples were analysed using the validated spectrophotometric method.

resultsA total of 36 samples were analysed. The standard curve showed linearity for phenylephrine (R

conclusionsCurrent ad-hoc dilution methods used to prepare intracameral phenylephrine are inaccurate and highly variable. Small volume 1 ml syringes should not be used for mixing or dilution of drug. Commercial intracameral phenylephrine products would address dosage concerns and could improve surgical outcomes in cases of poor pupil dilation and/or floppy iris syndrome.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCataract ExtractionDrug CompoundingHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMydriaticsPhenylephrineMydriaticsPhenylephrine

Identifiers

PMID29907787
PMCPMC6189205
OpenAlexW2808171429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.