ArticleScientific reports2018
All-depth dispersion cancellation in spectral domain optical coherence tomography using numerical intensity correlations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dispersion mismatch correction for evident chromatic anomaly in low coherence interferometry.APL photonics · 2024Article
- Extracting Group Velocity Dispersion values using quantum-mimic Optical Coherence Tomography and Machine Learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Ultrahigh resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography using the 1000-1600 nm spectral band.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Artefact-removal algorithms for Fourier domain quantum optical coherence tomography.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Intensity correlation OCT is a classical mimic of quantum OCT providing up to twofold resolution improvement.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Line field Fourier domain optical coherence tomography based on a spatial light modulator.Applied optics · 2021Article
- Structural and Functional Sensing of Bio-Tissues Based on Compressive Sensing Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Real-time high-resolution mid-infrared optical coherence tomography.Light, science & applications · 2019Article
- Recovering distance information in spectral domain interferometry.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In ultra-high resolution (UHR-) optical coherence tomography (OCT) group velocity dispersion (GVD) must be corrected for in order to approach the theoretical resolution limit. One approach promises not only compensation, but complete annihilation of even order dispersion effects, and that at all sample depths. This approach has hitherto been demonstrated with an experimentally demanding 'balanced detection' configuration based on using two detectors. We demonstrate intensity correlation (IC) OCT using a conventional spectral domain (SD) UHR-OCT system with a single detector. IC-SD-OCT configurations exhibit cross term ghost images and a reduced axial range, half of that of conventional SD-OCT. We demonstrate that both shortcomings can be removed by applying a generic artefact reduction algorithm and using analytic interferograms. We show the superiority of IC-SD-OCT compared to conventional SD-OCT by showing how IC-SD-OCT is able to image spatial structures behind a strongly dispersive silicon wafer. Finally, we question the resolution enhancement of [Formula: see text] that IC-SD-OCT is often believed to have compared to SD-OCT. We show that this is simply the effect of squaring the reflectivity profile as a natural result of processing the product of two intensity spectra instead of a single spectrum.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.