Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29907560›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Detecting Infectious Disease Symptoms in Primary Care Electronic Medical Records in Singapore.

Antony Hardjojo, Arunan Gunachandran, Long Pang, Mohammed Ridzwan Bin Abdullah, Win Wah, Joash Wen Chen Chong, Ee Hui Goh, Sok Huang Teo, Gilbert Lim, Mong Li Lee and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying Urinary Tract Infection-Related Information in Home Care Nursing Notes.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Antony HardjojoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2823-7996
Arunan GunachandranSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-9011
Long PangSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2610-4719
Mohammed Ridzwan Bin AbdullahSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-0701
Win WahSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4242-5651
Joash Wen Chen ChongSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-9619
Ee Hui GohSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-8532
Sok Huang TeoNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-6450
Gilbert LimSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-9250
Mong Li LeeSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-388X
Wynne HsuSchool of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-8893
Vernon LeeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-3566
Mark I-Cheng ChenSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9369-5830
Franco WongNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5815-4756
Jonathan Siung King PhangNational Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6175-7766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFree-text clinical records provide a source of information that complements traditional disease surveillance. To electronically harness these records, they need to be transformed into codified fields by natural language processing algorithms.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop, train, and validate Clinical History Extractor for Syndromic Surveillance (CHESS), an natural language processing algorithm to extract clinical information from free-text primary care records.

methodsCHESS is a keyword-based natural language processing algorithm to extract 48 signs and symptoms suggesting respiratory infections, gastrointestinal infections, constitutional, as well as other signs and symptoms potentially associated with infectious diseases. The algorithm also captured the assertion status (affirmed, negated, or suspected) and symptom duration. Electronic medical records from the National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, a major public sector primary care provider in Singapore, were randomly extracted and manually reviewed by 2 human reviewers, with a third reviewer as the adjudicator. The algorithm was evaluated based on 1680 notes against the human-coded result as the reference standard, with half of the data used for training and the other half for validation.

resultsThe symptoms most commonly present within the 1680 clinical records at the episode level were those typically present in respiratory infections such as cough (744/7703, 9.66%), sore throat (591/7703, 7.67%), rhinorrhea (552/7703, 7.17%), and fever (928/7703, 12.04%). At the episode level, CHESS had an overall performance of 96.7% precision and 97.6% recall on the training dataset and 96.0% precision and 93.1% recall on the validation dataset. Symptoms suggesting respiratory and gastrointestinal infections were all detected with more than 90% precision and recall. CHESS correctly assigned the assertion status in 97.3%, 97.9%, and 89.8% of affirmed, negated, and suspected signs and symptoms, respectively (97.6% overall accuracy). Symptom episode duration was correctly identified in 81.2% of records with known duration status.

conclusionsWe have developed an natural language processing algorithm dubbed CHESS that achieves good performance in extracting signs and symptoms from primary care free-text clinical records. In addition to the presence of symptoms, our algorithm can also accurately distinguish affirmed, negated, and suspected assertion statuses and extract symptom durations.

Indexed as

communicable diseaseselectronic health recordsepidemiologynatural language processingsurveillancesyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID29907560
PMCPMC6026305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.