Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29907154›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2018

Temporal changes in macrophage phenotype after peripheral nerve injury.

Joy E Tomlinson, Emilija Žygelytė, Jennifer K Grenier, Michael G Edwards, Jonathan Cheetham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joy E TomlinsonCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Emilija ŽygelytėCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jennifer K GrenierCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Michael G EdwardsBioinfo Solutions LLC, Parker, CO, USA.
Jonathan CheethamCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA. jc485@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-5261
Cornell University · USParker Hannifin (United States) · US

Funding

Manipulating Macrophage Phenotype in Laryngeal Nerve RepairR03DC013376 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CHEETHAM, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2015
$478k
NIDCD NIH HHS 5RO3DCO13376-03NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophages play a key role in peripheral nerve repair and demonstrate complex phenotypes that are highly dependent on microenvironmental cues.

methodsWe determined temporal changes in macrophage gene expression over time using RNA sequencing after fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) macrophage populations from injured peripheral nerve. We identified key upstream regulators and dominant pathways using ingenuity pathway analysis and confirmed these changes with NanoString technology. We then investigate the effects of extreme polarizers of macrophage phenotype (IL4 and IFNγ) on nerve regeneration. We determined macrophage gene expression in vivo at the site of peripheral nerve injury with NanoString technology, and assessed recovery from sciatic nerve injury by cranial tibial muscle weights and retrograde labeling motor neurons in mice with deletion of IL4 or IFNγ receptors.

resultsWe demonstrate that IL4R and IFNγR deletions provide complementary responses to polarization, and alter expression of genes associated with angiogenesis and axonal extension, but do not influence recovery from peripheral nerve transection at 8 weeks after repair.

conclusionsOverall, this study provides a framework to evaluate the phenotype of macrophages over time, and provides a broader and more precise assessment of gene expression changes than has previously been commonly used. This data suggests ways in which polarization may be modulated to improve repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFlow CytometryGene Expression RegulationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsInterferon gamma ReceptorInterleukin-1Interleukin-4 Receptor alpha SubunitLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNerve RegenerationCytokinesIl4ra protein, mouseIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsInterferon gamma ReceptorInterleukin-1Interleukin-4 Receptor alpha SubunitLipopolysaccharidesReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, InterferonGene expressionMacrophageNerve injuryRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID29907154
PMCPMC6003127
OpenAlexW2808243780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.