Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29907128›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Protecting Adolescents in Low- And Middle-Income Countries from Interpersonal Violence (PRO YOUTH TRIAL): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 ("Familias Fuertes") in Panama.

Anilena Mejia, Richard Emsley, Eleonora Fichera, Wadih Maalouf, Jeremy Segrott, Rachel Calam

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Program (10-14): a scoping RE-AIM-based review.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anilena MejiaInstituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología, City of Knowledge, Building 219, Clayton, 0843-01103, Panama, Republic of Panama. amejia@indicasat.org.pa.
Richard EmsleyKings College London, London, UK.
Eleonora FicheraThe University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Wadih MaaloufUnited Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria.
Jeremy SegrottCentre for Trials Research, DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rachel CalamThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/P010849/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterpersonal violence can significantly reduce adolescents' opportunities for becoming happy and healthy adults. Central America is the most violent region in the world and it is estimated that adolescents are involved in 82% of all homicides in this region. Family skills training programmes have been designed to prevent interpersonal violence in adolescents. Several studies in high-income countries suggest they are effective. However, there are no published trials assessing effectiveness of these programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (SFP 10-14 or "Familias Fuertes") in Panama, a LMIC in Central America. An embedded process evaluation will examine the extent to which the intervention is delivered as intended, variation across trial sites, influences on implementation and intervention-context interactions. Cost-effectiveness will also be assessed.

methodsThis is a cluster randomised controlled trial. The 28 townships with the highest homicide rates in Panama will be randomly allocated to implementation of SFP 10-14 alongside services-as-usual or to services-as-usual only. Approximately 30 families will be recruited in each township, a total sample of 840 families. Families will be assessed at baseline, approximately eight weeks after baseline (i.e. post intervention), six months and 12 months after. The primary outcome measure will be the parent reported externalising subscale of the Child Behaviour Checklist at T3 (i.e., which is approximately 12 months after baseline). For the process evaluation, recruitment, attendance, fidelity and receipt will be measured. Qualitative interviews with facilitators, trainers, parents and adolescents will explore barriers/facilitators to implementation and intervention receipt. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, service use information will be gathered from parents and adolescents with a three-month recall period. Costs and consequences associated with implementation of the intervention will be identified. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to evaluate SFP 10-14 in a LMIC. Results have the potential to guide public policies for the prevention of interpersonal violence in Central America and beyond.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry, 14023111 . Registered on 13 July 2017.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorDeveloping CountriesFamily RelationsInterpersonal RelationsPovertyAdolescentAge FactorsChecklistChildFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPanamaParentingAdolescenceFamily skills training programmesInterpersonal violenceLow- and middle-income countriesPanamaPreventionStrengthening Families Programme 10–14 (SFP 10–14)

Identifiers

PMID29907128
PMCPMC6003024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.