Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29907102›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2018

Time series model for forecasting the number of new admission inpatients.

Lingling Zhou, Ping Zhao, Dongdong Wu, Cheng Cheng, Hao Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Forecasting the rate of hand injuries in Singapore.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lingling ZhouDepartment of Information, Research Institute of Field Surgery, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Access Road, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Ping ZhaoDepartment of Information, Research Institute of Field Surgery, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Access Road, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Dongdong WuDepartment of Information, Research Institute of Field Surgery, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Access Road, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Cheng ChengDepartment of Information, Research Institute of Field Surgery, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Access Road, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Hao HuangDepartment of Information, Research Institute of Field Surgery, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, 10 Changjiang Access Road, Chongqing, 400042, China. m13608388426@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-7077
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital crowding is a rising problem, effective predicting and detecting managment can helpful to reduce crowding. Our team has successfully proposed a hybrid model combining both the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and the nonlinear autoregressive neural network (NARNN) models in the schistosomiasis and hand, foot, and mouth disease forecasting study. In this paper, our aim is to explore the application of the hybrid ARIMA-NARNN model to track the trends of the new admission inpatients, which provides a methodological basis for reducing crowding.

methodsWe used the single seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), NARNN and the hybrid SARIMA-NARNN model to fit and forecast the monthly and daily number of new admission inpatients. The root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used to compare the forecasting performance among the three models. The modeling time range of monthly data included was from January 2010 to June 2016, July to October 2016 as the corresponding testing data set. The daily modeling data set was from January 4 to September 4, 2016, while the testing time range included was from September 5 to October 2, 2016.

resultsFor the monthly data, the modeling RMSE and the testing RMSE, MAE and MAPE of SARIMA-NARNN model were less than those obtained from the single SARIMA or NARNN model, but the MAE and MAPE of modeling performance of SARIMA-NARNN model did not improve. For the daily data, all RMSE, MAE and MAPE of NARNN model were the lowest both in modeling stage and testing stage.

conclusionsHybrid model does not necessarily outperform its constituents' performances. It is worth attempting to explore the reliable model to forecast the number of new admission inpatients from different data.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalNeural Networks, ComputerChinaForecastingHumansInpatientsPatient AdmissionHybrid modelNARNN modelNew admission inpatientsSARIMA modelTime series forecasting

Identifiers

PMID29907102
PMCPMC6003180
OpenAlexW2808519342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.