ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Taxonomy-aware feature engineering for microbiome classification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Host phenotype classification from human microbiome data is mainly driven by the presence of microbial taxa.PLoS computational biology · 2022Pooled it
- UniCoracle: automated hierarchical feature selection via bottom-up propagation and top-down skimming using the UniCorP algorithm and the Coracle machine-learning framework.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- TAGINE: fast taxonomy-based feature engineering for microbiome analysis.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Effects of zacopride and multidimensional impacts of cross-kingdom symbiosis: gut microbiota modulates coronary microvascular dysfunction via the chlorophyll/heme-tryptophan metabolic axis.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- UniCor and UniCorP: a novel metric and hierarchical feature selection algorithm for microbial community analysis.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Beyond microbial abundance: metadata integration enhances disease prediction in human microbiome studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Exploring and exploiting the rice phytobiome to tackle climate change challenges.Plant communications · 2024Review
- Evaluating algorithms of decision tree, support vector machine and regression for anode side catalyst data in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Critical assessment of on-premise approaches to scalable genome analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Rumen Microbiota Predicts Feed Efficiency of Primiparous Nordic Red Dairy Cows.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Enhanced metagenomic deep learning for disease prediction and consistent signature recognition by restructured microbiome 2D representations.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- TaxaHFE: a machine learning approach to collapse microbiome datasets using taxonomic structure.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- microBiomeGSM: the identification of taxonomic biomarkers from metagenomic data using grouping, scoring and modeling (G-S-M) approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Predicting environmental stressor levels with machine learning: a comparison between amplicon sequencing, metagenomics, and total RNA sequencing based on taxonomically assigned data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Interpreting tree ensemble machine learning models with endoR.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Human disease prediction from microbiome data by multiple feature fusion and deep learning.iScience · 2022Article
- Interpretable prediction of necrotizing enterocolitis from machine learning analysis of premature infant stool microbiota.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Interfacing Machine Learning and Microbial Omics: A Promising Means to Address Environmental Challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhat is a healthy microbiome? The pursuit of this and many related questions, especially in light of the recently recognized microbial component in a wide range of diseases has sparked a surge in metagenomic studies. They are often not simply attributable to a single pathogen but rather are the result of complex ecological processes. Relatedly, the increasing DNA sequencing depth and number of samples in metagenomic case-control studies enabled the applicability of powerful statistical methods, e.g. Machine Learning approaches. For the latter, the feature space is typically shaped by the relative abundances of operational taxonomic units, as determined by cost-effective phylogenetic marker gene profiles. While a substantial body of microbiome/microbiota research involves unsupervised and supervised Machine Learning, very little attention has been put on feature selection and engineering.
resultsWe here propose the first algorithm to exploit phylogenetic hierarchy (i.e. an all-encompassing taxonomy) in feature engineering for microbiota classification. The rationale is to exploit the often mono- or oligophyletic distribution of relevant (but hidden) traits by virtue of taxonomic abstraction. The algorithm is embedded in a comprehensive microbiota classification pipeline, which we applied to a diverse range of datasets, distinguishing healthy from diseased microbiota samples.
conclusionWe demonstrate substantial improvements over the state-of-the-art microbiota classification tools in terms of classification accuracy, regardless of the actual Machine Learning technique while using drastically reduced feature spaces. Moreover, generalized features bear great explanatory value: they provide a concise description of conditions and thus help to provide pathophysiological insights. Indeed, the automatically and reproducibly derived features are consistent with previously published domain expert analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.