Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29906457›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2018

Enhanced perception of pitch changes in speech and music in early blind adults.

Laureline Arnaud, Vincent Gracco, Lucie Ménard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Performing Simulated Basic Life Support without Seeing: Blind vs. Blindfolded People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laureline ArnaudIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Center for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: laureline.arnaud@mail.mcgill.ca.
Vincent GraccoCenter for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: vincent.gracco@yale.edu.
Lucie MénardCenter for Research on Brain, Language, and Music, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Département de Linguistique, UQAM, Montréal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: menard.lucie@uqam.ca.

Funding

Speech Motor Learning and Sensory Plasticity in Children and AdultsR01DC012502 · NIDCD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI OSTRY, DAVID J · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that congenitally blind adults have enhanced auditory processing for some tasks. For instance, they show supra-normal capacity to perceive accelerated speech. However, only a few studies have investigated basic auditory processing in this population. In this study, we investigated if pitch processing enhancement in the blind is a domain-general or domain-specific phenomenon, and if pitch processing shares the same properties as in the sighted regarding how scores from different domains are associated. Fifteen congenitally blind adults and fifteen sighted adults participated in the study. We first created a set of personalized native and non-native vowel stimuli using an identification and rating task. Then, an adaptive discrimination paradigm was used to determine the frequency difference limen for pitch direction identification of speech (native and non-native vowels) and non-speech stimuli (musical instruments and pure tones). The results show that the blind participants had better discrimination thresholds than controls for native vowels, music stimuli, and pure tones. Whereas within the blind group, the discrimination thresholds were smaller for musical stimuli than speech stimuli, replicating previous findings in sighted participants, we did not find this effect in the current control group. Further analyses indicate that older sighted participants show higher thresholds for instrument sounds compared to speech sounds. This effect of age was not found in the blind group. Moreover, the scores across domains were not associated to the same extent in the blind as they were in the sighted. In conclusion, in addition to providing further evidence of compensatory auditory mechanisms in early blind individuals, our results point to differences in how auditory processing is modulated in this population.

Indexed as

MusicAcoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceBlindnessCorrelation of DataFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPitch PerceptionSpeechSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultAdaptive staircaseBlindnessMusicNative and foreign vowelsPitch perceptionSpeech

Identifiers

PMID29906457
PMCPMC6090560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.