ArticleNeuropsychologia2018
Enhanced perception of pitch changes in speech and music in early blind adults.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Auditory performance and cortical plasticity in blind individuals with sensorineural hearing loss: insights into dual sensory impairment.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Impact of Spectral and Temporal Degradation on Vocoded Speech Recognition in Early-Blind Individuals.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Perception and discrimination of real-life emotional vocalizations in early blind individuals.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Cognitive Crescendo: How Music Shapes the Brain's Structure and Function.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Gyrification in relation to cortical thickness in the congenitally blind.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enhanced Dichotic Listening and Temporal Sequencing Ability in Early-Blind Individuals.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Performing Simulated Basic Life Support without Seeing: Blind vs. Blindfolded People.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Blind footballers direct their head towards an approaching ball during ball trapping.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Rapid identification of sound direction in blind footballers.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Influence of Visual Deprivation on Auditory Spectral Resolution, Temporal Resolution, and Speech Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well known that congenitally blind adults have enhanced auditory processing for some tasks. For instance, they show supra-normal capacity to perceive accelerated speech. However, only a few studies have investigated basic auditory processing in this population. In this study, we investigated if pitch processing enhancement in the blind is a domain-general or domain-specific phenomenon, and if pitch processing shares the same properties as in the sighted regarding how scores from different domains are associated. Fifteen congenitally blind adults and fifteen sighted adults participated in the study. We first created a set of personalized native and non-native vowel stimuli using an identification and rating task. Then, an adaptive discrimination paradigm was used to determine the frequency difference limen for pitch direction identification of speech (native and non-native vowels) and non-speech stimuli (musical instruments and pure tones). The results show that the blind participants had better discrimination thresholds than controls for native vowels, music stimuli, and pure tones. Whereas within the blind group, the discrimination thresholds were smaller for musical stimuli than speech stimuli, replicating previous findings in sighted participants, we did not find this effect in the current control group. Further analyses indicate that older sighted participants show higher thresholds for instrument sounds compared to speech sounds. This effect of age was not found in the blind group. Moreover, the scores across domains were not associated to the same extent in the blind as they were in the sighted. In conclusion, in addition to providing further evidence of compensatory auditory mechanisms in early blind individuals, our results point to differences in how auditory processing is modulated in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.