Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29906430›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2018

Five-Year Postoperative Outcomes of Bilateral Aphakia and Pseudophakia in Children up to 2 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abhay R Vasavada, Vaishali Vasavada, Sajani K Shah, M R Praveen, Viraj A Vasavada, Rupal H Trivedi, Farida Rawat, Archana Koul

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Risk factors for capsular phimosis following congenital cataract extraction.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abhay R VasavadaIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. Electronic address: icirc@abhayvasavada.com.
Vaishali VasavadaIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Sajani K ShahIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
M R PraveenIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Viraj A VasavadaIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Rupal H TrivediStorm Eye Institute, MUSC, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Farida RawatIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Archana KoulIladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComparative evaluation of complications and visual outcomes following bilateral congenital cataract surgery in children up to 2 years of age with and without primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at 5 years follow-up.

designRandomized controlled clinical trial.

methodsSixty children (120 eyes) up to 2 years of age undergoing bilateral congenital cataract surgery were randomized to Group 1, primary aphakia (n = 30), or Group 2, primary IOL implantation (pseudophakia) (n = 30). A single surgeon performed surgeries with identical surgical technique. All patients were followed up regularly until 5 years postoperatively. At each follow-up, glaucoma, visual axis obscuration (VAO) requiring surgery, and inflammation (cell deposits, posterior synechiae) were assessed. Visual acuity was assessed until 5 years follow-up. The first operated eye was selected for statistical analysis.

resultsMedian age of the patients at time of surgery was 5.11 months (aphakia group) and 6.01 months (pseudophakia group) (P = .56). Five years postoperatively, incidence of glaucoma was 16% and 13.8% in Groups 1 and 2 (P = .82). Incidence of posterior synechiae was significantly higher in the pseudophakia group (27.6%) compared to the aphakia group (8%) (P = .004). VAO requiring surgery was seen in 8% and 10.3% of eyes in Groups 1 and 2 (P = .76). Mean logMAR visual acuity at 5 years follow-up was 0.59 ± 0.33 and 0.5 ± 0.23 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .79). However, more eyes in the pseudophakic group started giving documentable vision earlier in their postoperative follow-ups.

conclusionsIncidence of postoperative complications was comparable between the groups, except for a higher incidence of posterior synechiae in pseudophakic eyes. Visual rehabilitation was faster in the pseudophakic group.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionLens Implantation, IntraocularPostoperative ComplicationsAphakia, PostcataractCataractContact LensesFemaleHumansInfantLenses, IntraocularMalePseudophakiaTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVision DisordersVisual Acuity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.