Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29906286›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Nonmechanistic forecasts of seasonal influenza with iterative one-week-ahead distributions.

Logan C Brooks, David C Farrow, Sangwon Hyun, Ryan J Tibshirani, Roni Rosenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An open repository of real-time COVID-19 indicators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Logan C BrooksSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0877-4978
David C FarrowSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Sangwon HyunDepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0377-897X
Ryan J TibshiraniSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2158-8304
Roni RosenfeldSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-5862

Funding

Training, Outreach & Diversity ComponentU54GM088491 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROBERTS, MARK STENIUS · 2009 to 2018
$16.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reliable forecasts of seasonal epidemics of infectious disease can assist in the design of countermeasures and increase public awareness and preparedness. This article describes two main contributions we made recently toward this goal: a novel approach to probabilistic modeling of surveillance time series based on "delta densities", and an optimization scheme for combining output from multiple forecasting methods into an adaptively weighted ensemble. Delta densities describe the probability distribution of the change between one observation and the next, conditioned on available data; chaining together nonparametric estimates of these distributions yields a model for an entire trajectory. Corresponding distributional forecasts cover more observed events than alternatives that treat the whole season as a unit, and improve upon multiple evaluation metrics when extracting key targets of interest to public health officials. Adaptively weighted ensembles integrate the results of multiple forecasting methods, such as delta density, using weights that can change from situation to situation. We treat selection of optimal weightings across forecasting methods as a separate estimation task, and describe an estimation procedure based on optimizing cross-validation performance. We consider some details of the data generation process, including data revisions and holiday effects, both in the construction of these forecasting methods and when performing retrospective evaluation. The delta density method and an adaptively weighted ensemble of other forecasting methods each improve significantly on the next best ensemble component when applied separately, and achieve even better cross-validated performance when used in conjunction. We submitted real-time forecasts based on these contributions as part of CDC's 2015/2016 FluSight Collaborative Comparison. Among the fourteen submissions that season, this system was ranked by CDC as the most accurate.

Indexed as

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Communicable DiseasesEpidemicsForecastingHumansInfluenza, HumanModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalPublic HealthRetrospective StudiesSeasonsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29906286
PMCPMC6034894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.