ArticleJournal of animal science2018
Genetic relationships of antibody response, viremia level, and weight gain in pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus1.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of the frequency of individuals with broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies against PRRSV in the sow population under field conditions.Porcine health management · 2024Article
- Genetic and phenotypic correlations between Aleutian disease tests with body weight, growth, and feed efficiency traits in mink.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Genomics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in purebred and crossbred sows: antibody response and performance following natural infection vs. vaccination.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Reproductive Performance.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genomic Analysis of IgG Antibody Response to Common Pathogens in Commercial Sows in Health-Challenged Herds.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genome-wide association analysis for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus susceptibility traits in two genetic populations of pigs1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- The effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak on genetic parameters and reaction norms for reproductive performance in pigs1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Identification of factors associated with virus level in tonsils of pigs experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic and antigenic variability between Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) isolates has encumbered vaccine development. Here, the genetic basis of PRRSV antibody response was assessed using data from experimental infection trials of commercial crossbred weaner pigs across with one of two distinct PRRSV isolates, NVSL-97-7895 (~750 pigs) and KS-2006-72109 (~450 pigs). Objectives were to estimate the genetic parameters of antibody response, measured as the sample to positive ratio (S:P) of PRRSV N-protein specific IgG in serum at 42 d post infection (dpi); assess the relationship of S:P at 42 dpi with serum viremia and growth under infection; and identify genomic regions associated with S:P at 42 dpi. Estimates of heritability of S:P at 42 dpi for NVSL and KS06 were 0.31 ± 0.09 and 0.40 ± 0.10 and appeared to be under similar genetic control (genetic correlation 0.73 ± 0.39). Estimates of genetic correlations of S:P were generally weak with viral load (NVSL: -0.20 ± 0.18; KS06: -0.69 ± 0.20), measured as area under the curve of log10 serum viremia from 0 to 21 dpi, and with weight gain (WG) from 0 to 42 dpi (NVSL: -0.38 ± 0.19; KS06: -0.08 ± 0.25). However, genetic correlations of S:P at 42 dpi with daily serum viremia and with 3-d WG revealed dynamic relationships, with S:P at 42 dpi having the strongest negative genetic correlations with daily viremia when IgG production starts (10-20 dpi), and negative genetic correlations with WG early after infection but positive later on. This suggests that animals that placed more emphasis on immune response early in infection reaped benefits of that later in infection by more effectively clearing the virus. The WUR10000125 SNP on SSC4, previously associated with response to PRRSV, did not have a significant effect on S:P at 42 dpi (P > 0.05) but genotype-specific genetic correlations of S:P with daily viremia and 3-d WG suggested that the lower WG of pigs with the unfavorable AA WUR10000125 genotype may be due to their utilization of a more energetically costly host response compared to pigs with the favorable genotype. Genome-wide association studies identified three SNPs in the Major Histocompatibility Complex associated with S:P that explained ~10 (NVSL) and 45% (KS06) of the genetic variance but were not associated with viremia or WG. In conclusion, antibody response to PRRSV infection is a possible biomarker for improved host response to PRRSV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.